mirror of
https://github.com/hibiken/asynq.git
synced 2026-04-26 07:25:56 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #574] [BUG] hanlder not found for task #2299
Labels
No labels
CLI
bug
designing
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
good first issue
help wanted
idea
invalid
investigate
needs-more-info
performance
pr-welcome
pull-request
question
wontfix
work in progress
work in progress
work-around-available
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/asynq#2299
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @mindon on GitHub (Nov 17, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/574
Originally assigned to: @hibiken on GitHub.
Describe the bug
hanlder not found for task happens sometimes
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
Not such a not-found-error
Screenshots

Environment (please complete the following information):
@mindon commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2022):
this issue comes from ErrorHandler of a worker for typename = b, telling there's no handler for typename = a
using different queue to handler different tasks
@risyadaji commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2023):
hi @mindon could you explain how you fix this issue? i have same problem
thanks before
@mindon commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2023):
@risyadaji all the queques and handlers should be matched
@risyadaji commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2023):
yup, i already found the solution. Thanks for the insight! @mindon
@mohit-singh-pepper commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2023):
@risyadaji @mindon what do you mean by "all the queques and handlers should be matched". Can you please elaborate.
@mindon commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2023):
it means: if there's a task request without a relative handler, you will surely get this error.
@risyadaji commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2023):
@mohit-singh-pepper my workaround is when enqueueing the task i put task name and also the queue name (using
asynq.Queue(queueName)).