starred/asynq

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/hibiken/asynq.git synced 2026-04-25 23:15:51 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #447] [FEATURE REQUEST] Expose an option to change standard cron parser for a scheduler #206

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-02 05:19:37 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 05:19:37 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @SergeyNSW on GitHub (May 4, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/447

Originally assigned to: @hibiken on GitHub.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'd like to have an ability to run a job every N seconds, the cron package used behind the scene allows to have extended (with seconds) or custom schedule parser, but the async uses default one.
Describe the solution you'd like
Is it possible to extend the asynq.SchedulerOpts so that it would accept custom cron.ScheduleParser and pass it as an option to the cron instance?
Thanks

Originally created by @SergeyNSW on GitHub (May 4, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/447 Originally assigned to: @hibiken on GitHub. **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** I'd like to have an ability to run a job every N seconds, the cron package used behind the scene allows to have extended (with seconds) or custom schedule parser, but the async uses default one. **Describe the solution you'd like** Is it possible to extend the asynq.SchedulerOpts so that it would accept custom cron.ScheduleParser and pass it as an option to the cron instance? Thanks

kerem

2026-03-02 05:19:37 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

work in progress
labels

kerem commented

2026-03-02 05:19:38 +03:00

Author

Owner

@hibiken commented on GitHub (May 10, 2022):

@SergeyNSW thank you for this issue!

It makes sense to me. We probably don't want to directly expose the cron.SchedulerParser since that would complicate the versioning, but since the SchedulerParser is defined with interfaces we can simply expose that same and pass it to cron package behind the scene. Let me work on this soon 👍

@hibiken commented on GitHub (May 10, 2022): @SergeyNSW thank you for this issue! It makes sense to me. We probably don't want to directly expose the `cron.SchedulerParser` since that would complicate the versioning, but since the `SchedulerParser` is defined with interfaces we can simply expose that same and pass it to `cron` package behind the scene. Let me work on this soon 👍

kerem commented

2026-03-02 05:19:38 +03:00

Author

Owner

@SergeyNSW commented on GitHub (May 10, 2022):

Thank you, looking forward to this improvement.

On 10 May 2022, at 16:03, Ken Hibino @.***> wrote:

@SergeyNSW https://github.com/SergeyNSW thank you for this issue!

It makes sense to me. We probably don't want to directly expose the cron.SchedulerParser since that would complicate the versioning, but since the SchedulerParser is defined with interfaces we can simply expose that same and pass it to cron package behind the scene. Let me work on this soon 👍

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/447#issuecomment-1122361047, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVODLEFCYNWO32BB26HWFLLVJJNBNANCNFSM5VB2GIFA.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

@SergeyNSW commented on GitHub (May 10, 2022): Thank you, looking forward to this improvement. > On 10 May 2022, at 16:03, Ken Hibino ***@***.***> wrote: > > > @SergeyNSW <https://github.com/SergeyNSW> thank you for this issue! > > It makes sense to me. We probably don't want to directly expose the cron.SchedulerParser since that would complicate the versioning, but since the SchedulerParser is defined with interfaces we can simply expose that same and pass it to cron package behind the scene. Let me work on this soon 👍 > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/447#issuecomment-1122361047>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVODLEFCYNWO32BB26HWFLLVJJNBNANCNFSM5VB2GIFA>. > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. >

kerem commented

2026-03-02 05:19:38 +03:00

Author

Owner

@hibiken commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2022):

Upon looking, it seems like spec like "@every 30s" works without a custom schedule parser. Does that work for you?

@hibiken commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2022): Upon looking, it seems like spec like `"@every 30s"` works without a custom schedule parser. Does that work for you?

kerem commented

2026-03-02 05:19:38 +03:00

Author

Owner

@SergeyNSW commented on GitHub (Jun 6, 2022):

yes, it works for me, thanks

@SergeyNSW commented on GitHub (Jun 6, 2022): yes, it works for me, thanks

kerem commented

2026-03-02 05:19:38 +03:00

Author

Owner

@acaloiaro commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2023):

Hi @hibiken -- I know this issue is closed, but I think it might be worth considering a different option, which some users might find less surprising:

In scheduler.go

- cron: cron.New(cron.WithLocation(loc)),
+ cron: cron.New(cron.WithLocation(loc), cron.WithSeconds()),

Which allows users to supply their cronspecs with the full six fields * * * * * *

@acaloiaro commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2023): Hi @hibiken -- I know this issue is closed, but I think it might be worth considering a different option, which some users might find less surprising: In `scheduler.go` ```go - cron: cron.New(cron.WithLocation(loc)), + cron: cron.New(cron.WithLocation(loc), cron.WithSeconds()), ``` Which allows users to supply their cronspecs with the full six fields `* * * * * *`

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-02 06:05:21 +03:00

[PR #374] [MERGED] feat: --json flag for asynq stats command #725

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-07 22:05:28 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #206] [FEATURE REQUEST] JSON output flag for asynq stats #1086

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-07 22:12:58 +03:00

[PR #374] [MERGED] feat: --json flag for asynq stats command #1733

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-15 19:08:36 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #206] [FEATURE REQUEST] JSON output flag for asynq stats #2095