starred/asynq

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/hibiken/asynq.git synced 2026-04-25 23:15:51 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #856] [FEATURE REQUEST] Support dynamic queue #1434

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-07 22:09:32 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:09:32 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @yangzhiw on GitHub (Apr 8, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/856

Originally assigned to: @hibiken on GitHub.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
My usage scenario is that I want to put different businesses into different queues. Businesses change dynamically. When the program is running, it supports putting different data into different queues, and different queues support different threads. consumption.

Originally created by @yangzhiw on GitHub (Apr 8, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/856 Originally assigned to: @hibiken on GitHub. **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** My usage scenario is that I want to put different businesses into different queues. Businesses change dynamically. When the program is running, it supports putting different data into different queues, and different queues support different threads. consumption.

kerem added the

enhancement

label

2026-03-07 22:09:32 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:09:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@kamikazechaser commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2024):

Related to #850, #852

@kamikazechaser commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2024): Related to #850, #852

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:09:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@yangzhiw commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2024):

Thank you. Another inquiry: Different queues use different coroutines to consume, and queue-level concurrency is supported; because looking at the source code now, it seems that there is only one processor to pull data.

@yangzhiw commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2024): Thank you. Another inquiry: Different queues use different coroutines to consume, and queue-level concurrency is supported; because looking at the source code now, it seems that there is only one processor to pull data.

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:09:33 +03:00

Author

Owner

@kamikazechaser commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2024):

That is also being addressed in #849

@kamikazechaser commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2024): That is also being addressed in #849

kerem commented

2026-03-07 22:09:33 +03:00

Author

Owner

@gsaraf commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2025):

Hi! I'm looking at a similar requirement, and would be interested in extending this feature to make the queue update more "on-the-fly". So instead of shutting down the server and bringing it back up with the new configuraiton, we would update the required configurations where needed.

I don't think it is blocking the current implementation in #879. Would there be interest in an improvement on top?

@gsaraf commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2025): Hi! I'm looking at a similar requirement, and would be interested in extending this feature to make the queue update more "on-the-fly". So instead of shutting down the server and bringing it back up with the new configuraiton, we would update the required configurations where needed. I don't think it is blocking the current implementation in #879. Would there be interest in an improvement on top?

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/asynq#1434

No description provided.

Rows
Columns