mirror of
https://github.com/hibiken/asynq.git
synced 2026-04-25 23:15:51 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #431] [Question] Will this work with AWS MemoryDB ? #1208
Labels
No labels
CLI
bug
designing
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
good first issue
help wanted
idea
invalid
investigate
needs-more-info
performance
pr-welcome
pull-request
question
wontfix
work in progress
work in progress
work-around-available
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/asynq#1208
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @rohitjha941 on GitHub (Apr 7, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/hibiken/asynq/issues/431
@hibiken commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2022):
@rohitjha941 Thank you for the question!
Currently, we don't support other message brokers other than Redis. Related feature request #173
But given that AWS MemoryDB is Redis compatible this may be easier to add support for.
If you don't mind, would you mind sharing why you'd use AWS MemoryDB instead of Redis?
@rohitjha941 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2022):
I was thinking about using memory DB as it persists data during shutdown/failover and it is cheaper than running a managed Redis instance with failover.
@hibiken commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2022):
Makes sense. I'll look into this when I work on #173
@sudslab commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2023):
Any update on this? We are currently deployed in AWS - would be great to use a managed-cluster vs running our own on k8s. Thanks!
@chayim commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2023):
@sudslab instead of memorydb have you thought about just using Redis Cloud? You don't have to handle any of the clustering, and get the same features?
@abit2 commented on GitHub (Oct 1, 2024):
Tried using memorydb cluster.
Seems similar to this. https://github.com/redis/go-redis/issues/2046