[GH-ISSUE #244] *@*.onion email addresses rejected #779

Open
opened 2026-03-14 10:33:22 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @bruceleerabbit on GitHub (Dec 24, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/244

When supplying an onion email address for delivery of forwarded msgs, the UI responds with:

“The email must be a valid email address”

Onion email addresses are valid but the mail server needs to be configured to handle it. There are some email services which don't even offer clearnet email addresses, in which case users are excluded from anonaddy. And because most senders don't know what to do with an onion email address, those email services tend to go underutilized among scant options in the clearnet apart from tech giants.

To date, I don't believe there is a single email forwarding provider who knows how to accommodate onion email addresses. So adding that capability would be yet another unique feature by which anonaddy would stand apart from the crowd.

Originally created by @bruceleerabbit on GitHub (Dec 24, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/244 When supplying an onion email address for delivery of forwarded msgs, the UI responds with: “The email must be a valid email address” Onion email addresses are valid but the mail server needs to be configured to handle it. There are some email services which don't even offer clearnet email addresses, in which case users are excluded from anonaddy. And because most senders don't know what to do with an onion email address, those email services tend to go underutilized among scant options in the clearnet apart from tech giants. To date, I don't believe there is a single email forwarding provider who knows how to accommodate onion email addresses. So adding that capability would be yet another unique feature by which anonaddy would stand apart from the crowd.
Author
Owner

@willbrowningme commented on GitHub (Jan 12, 2022):

Thanks, I'll have to look into what changes need to be made to the server to handle onion addresses to see if I can add support for this.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1010891400 --> @willbrowningme commented on GitHub (Jan 12, 2022): Thanks, I'll have to look into what changes need to be made to the server to handle onion addresses to see if I can add support for this.
Author
Owner

@bruceleerabbit commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022):

You might find these instructions useful if you use Postfix:

https://github.com/JavaRockstar/onionmx/blob/master/postfix.md

<!-- gh-comment-id:1018441238 --> @bruceleerabbit commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022): You might find these instructions useful if you use Postfix: https://github.com/JavaRockstar/onionmx/blob/master/postfix.md
Author
Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Nov 6, 2022):

I too am looking forward to this feature!
Onion email support will allow anyone to self-host their email server, even those without open ports.
It will help decentralize the Internet, giving people more choice and allowing them to own their own data.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1304741631 --> @ghost commented on GitHub (Nov 6, 2022): I too am looking forward to this feature! Onion email support will allow anyone to self-host their email server, even those without open ports. It will help decentralize the Internet, giving people more choice and allowing them to own their own data.
Author
Owner

@willbrowningme commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2022):

Thanks for the link, looks very helpful. When I get time I'll try to set this up and also an onion site for the landing page.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1318349748 --> @willbrowningme commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2022): Thanks for the link, looks very helpful. When I get time I'll try to set this up and also an onion site for the landing page.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
bug
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/anonaddy#779
No description provided.