mirror of
https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy.git
synced 2026-04-25 06:05:55 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1] Docker Image #612
Labels
No labels
bug
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/anonaddy#612
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @andrewkdinh on GitHub (Jul 27, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/1
Any plans on a docker image, either built through a Dockerfile or as one on Docker Hub?
@anonaddy commented on GitHub (Aug 2, 2019):
Only just seen this, sorry. Not at the moment I'm afraid.
I haven't used docker before so would need to learn how to use it and how to create an image.
I'll be adding more details on setting up the server and Postfix for self hosting shortly though.
@irazasyed commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2019):
Yeah, Docker image / setup would be very cool. We recently started using for a bunch of our projects.
I can help you with this if you're open for it. We could make use of Docker Compose to have multiple images.
My recent custom image for a project:
https://github.com/ougco/docker-laravel-php
@anonaddy commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2019):
Thanks, that would be great.
I'll have a read about Docker Compose as I agree it would be great to able to spin up a VPS and self-host quickly instead of having to manually configure everything.
I've got a few things on my to do list at the moment but I'll try to make a start on this as soon as I can.
@ra-pha commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2019):
+1 for that idea
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2019):
Hey @anonaddy would you need help for the docker image ? I guess the main difficulty is that the services are intertwined in each other so it's needed to create a big docker image with everything...
Let me know if you want me to have a look at it.
@anonaddy commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2019):
@slurdge yes, thank you. I have a fair bit on my to do list at the moment so don't currently have time to look into learning Docker and to set this image up myself.
I can provide you with a list of all software required and basic configuration, feel free to contact me via email if you think that would be easier.
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2019):
I have a working Docker image but I haven't tested all the features. I can publish it right now but I prefer #12 and #13 to be fixed.
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2019):
Terrific! Would you mind sharing it even if it's not stable yet, I'm willing to guinea-pig and reinstall once #12 and #13 are fixed.
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2019):
@slurdge Image available at https://github.com/crazy-max/docker-anonaddy/
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2019):
@crazy-max I took a look at it, seems great. I only have one remark, shouldn't the web part and the postfix part be two separate containers ? They share some php code but I believe they have no dependencies on each other ?
Also, @anonaddy , I can't wrap my head around the need for MAIL_HOST/MAIL_USER/etc env variables. Why rely on a 3rd party SMTP server as postfix is right here ?
@anonaddy commented on GitHub (Dec 16, 2019):
@slurdge currently out of office so will respond properly in a day or two.
The MAIL_HOST and other env variables need to be removed from the env.example file, I forgot to update it.
The MAIL_DRIVER should be sendmail so that emails are sent using Postfix.
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Dec 17, 2019):
I tried the image provided by @crazy-max and could run it (at least web interface). I have a few issues (https/http mixed, etc.) that I'll try to resolve.
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2019):
@slurdge Leave an issue on my repo about that (maybe you missed
APP_URLen var).@slurdge commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2019):
Yes I'll open issues :-)
@anonaddy commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2019):
#12 and #13 should now both be sorted, thanks for the contributions. I'll be able to hopefully contribute to this image in the new year.
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Dec 23, 2019):
So, by playing around with @crazy-max new image, I was able to create a new recipient and confirm it.
I'm trying to sort out https://github.com/crazy-max/docker-anonaddy/issues/2 and then I should be able to test with incoming emails.
@h-town commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2020):
Thanks for your work here @crazy-max and @slurdge. Looking forward to this one!
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2020):
https://github.com/anonaddy/docker :)
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
Doing tests on it right now!
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
Fyi, I have set up a Vultr VPS instance (1 vCore CPU, 1024MB RAM, 25GB SSD) using an Alpine 3.12 ISO with a traefik and this AnonAddy docker image. For the DNS and domain I'm using Namecheap and everything looks good so far (~4 weeks).
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
I comment here because I'm not sure it comes from docker or anonaddy itself. After starting the instance, I can't create 'admin', 'anonaddy', or 'test' users. Is there any place where these forbidden usernames is defined ? Tells me they are already taken.
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
@slurdge You can't register against
https://anonaddy.example.com/register?@slurdge commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
@crazy-max I can, but if I select 'admin', 'anonaddy', or 'test' as the username, it refuses to register. However other logins like 'test123456' are fine. So there must be some kind of list of either pre-made accounts or forbidden accounts
@willbrowningme commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
@slurdge There is actually a username blacklist that is used here - https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/blob/master/config/anonaddy.php
Do you think it would be best to remove this for the self-hosted version?
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
@willbrowningme Thanks! I didn't find this list :-)
I think it's fine to leave it in the self-hosted version, after all, it's here for a reason!
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
@willbrowningme
Didn't know about that thanks for the tip!
It's fine to keep this list.
I think we can close this issue now, WDYT?
@slurdge commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
Well I still can't make it work from a pristine install, but maybe it's best to discuss it on the docker repo :-)
@crazy-max commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2020):
@slurdge Yeah if it's about anonaddy/docker#21 it's ok to close this issue.
@andrewkdinh commented on GitHub (Sep 4, 2020):
Looks great. Thanks!