starred/anonaddy

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy.git synced 2026-04-25 22:25:55 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #672] [Enhancement] Display inbound rejections to the user. #1038

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-14 11:34:06 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-14 11:34:06 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @RokeJulianLockhart on GitHub (Aug 11, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/672

As explained at discussions/670, I've had a message fail to reach a recipient of mine, which was luckily caught by app.addy.io/failed-deliveries (despite me having addy.io set as an excluded domain). However, this has made me realise that having a middleman just pushes the problem back:

Yes that banner is added when a message looks like spam or has a DMARC policy of none/quarantine that has failed. But if the domain had a DMARC policy of reject and it fails then it will be rejected.

Unfortunately, the functionality to verify that AnonAddy isn't blocking anything I care about doesn't exist, but is possible to provide (as discussions/670#discussioncomment-10303366 explains):

I may be able to parse the mail logs in order to also show inbound rejections in the future.

Consequently, I'd like to be able to see inbound rejections (alongside the aforementioned existent outbound rejection list) to ensure that Addy isn't blocking mail from senders that I care about.

Originally created by @RokeJulianLockhart on GitHub (Aug 11, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/672 As explained at [`discussions/670`](https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/discussions/670#discussion-7025806), I've had a message fail to reach a recipient of mine, which was luckily caught by [`app.addy.io/failed-deliveries`](https://app.addy.io/failed-deliveries#:~:text=Failed%20Deliveries-,Failed%20Deliveries,-A%20list%20of) (despite me having `addy.io` set as an excluded domain). However, this has made me realise that having a middleman just pushes the problem back: > Yes that banner is added when a message looks like spam or has a DMARC policy of none/quarantine that has failed. But if the domain had a DMARC policy of reject and it fails then it will be rejected. Unfortunately, the functionality to verify that AnonAddy isn't blocking anything I care about doesn't exist, but is possible to provide (as [`discussions/670#discussioncomment-10303366`](https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/discussions/670#discussioncomment-10303366) explains): > I may be able to parse the mail logs in order to also show inbound rejections in the future. Consequently, I'd like to be able to see inbound rejections (alongside the aforementioned existent outbound rejection list) to ensure that Addy isn't blocking mail *from senders that I care about*.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 11:34:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@hlbatt commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024):

Yes! addy.io has started blocking emails from meta to my aliases. It would be useful to be able to whitelist them myself rather than have to contact someone to fix it.

@hlbatt commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024): Yes! addy.io has started blocking emails from meta to my aliases. It would be useful to be able to whitelist them myself rather than have to contact someone to fix it.

kerem commented

2026-03-14 11:34:17 +03:00

Author

Owner

@RokeJulianLockhart commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024):

https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/672#issuecomment-2494031320

@hlbatt, I've missed e-mails from the Royal Air Force and Ministry of Defence Police due to this, too... It's a fairly significant flaw of most mail providers. ¹ I'd prefer this to not include AnonAddy too, though, especially considering that its filter is more sensitive.

reddit.com/user/rokejulianlockhart/comments/1ehld3w/comment/lgiodth ↩︎

@RokeJulianLockhart commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024): > https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/672#issuecomment-2494031320 @hlbatt, I've missed e-mails from the Royal Air Force and Ministry of Defence Police due to this, too... It's a fairly significant flaw of most mail providers. [^1] I'd prefer this to not include AnonAddy too, though, especially considering that its filter is more sensitive. [^1]: [`reddit.com/user/rokejulianlockhart/comments/1ehld3w/comment/lgiodth`](https://www.reddit.com/user/rokejulianlockhart/comments/1ehld3w/comment/lgiodth/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button#:~:text=rokejulianlockhart-,Proton%20Mail%20rejects%20mail%20using%20spam%20filters%20that%20can't%20be%20disabled.,-As%20this%20comment)

kerem commented

2026-03-14 11:34:22 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ririko5834 commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2025):

I think this should be added

@ririko5834 commented on GitHub (Aug 3, 2025): I think this should be added

kerem commented

2026-03-14 11:34:27 +03:00

Author

Owner

@RokeJulianLockhart commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2025):

@MajorTomDE, issues/779 and issues/785 appear to duplicate this.

@RokeJulianLockhart commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2025): @MajorTomDE, [`issues/779`](https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/779#issue-3533736272) and [`issues/785`](https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/785#issue-3558459111) appear to duplicate this.

No labels

bug

pull-request

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/anonaddy#1038

No description provided.

Rows
Columns