mirror of
https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy.git
synced 2026-04-25 14:15:53 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #659] [Enhancement] Improve the banner, especially in text/plain messages. #1036
Labels
No labels
bug
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/anonaddy#1036
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @RokeJulianLockhart on GitHub (Jul 11, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy/issues/659
Examples
Current
text/plainCode
Currently, undermentioned is what I see when I receive a
text/plainmessage:Rendered
This is similar to
/HTML-supported/Markdowncontent, it isn't really suitable for/plain:text/HTMLRendered
Undermentioned is what I see when I receive a
text/HTMLmessage:GitHub has sanitised it, but we know what we're referring to: https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16553232/example.zip
Code
There's no need to define fonts and colours here. It's a bit of an accessibility nightmare.
Suggestions
Basic Improvements
These aren't what I'd implement, because they're very slight improvements - they improve readability, but don't adequately enhance the ability to locate important content quickly. See the last section for a better example.
text/plainInstead, this would be a lot more readable if it used
text/markdownstylisation when in/plainformat:Rendered
Code
text/HTML...And could be made more easily actionable by linkifying the addresses, when in
/HTMLformat:Rendered
Code
Redesign
Though, I think this could still be clearer:
text/plainThis is perfectly valid
/Markdownthat is also legible as/plaindue to it not using any of/Markdown's advanced features.text/HTMLRendered
Code
I could have made the
Descriptionfield adhere to Markdown, but that seems like a separate request, so I've left it as plain text.