[GH-ISSUE #234] Google Cloud Vision API integration #226

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 15:55:43 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:55:43 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @prog20901 on GitHub (May 4, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/RD17/ambar/issues/234

a user can provide Google Cloud Vision API credentials.

when a user uploads a audio file or audio sermon or audio speech - (https://cloud.google.com/speech-to-text/) - ambar should send the request and get the response and store the response text and provide the search

this would be very useful. Assume couple of people going for a meeting for 1 hour and finally wanted to capture the minutes of meeting or wanted to search for a phrase discussed in the meeting. It would be impossible without the content as the meeting would went for hours.

This feature might be useful as only few AI speech to text is in the top rank - few are google cloud vision, otter.ai , IBM Voice etc.,

Originally created by @prog20901 on GitHub (May 4, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/RD17/ambar/issues/234 a user can provide Google Cloud Vision API credentials. when a user uploads a audio file or audio sermon or audio speech - (https://cloud.google.com/speech-to-text/) - ambar should send the request and get the response and store the response text and provide the search this would be very useful. Assume couple of people going for a meeting for 1 hour and finally wanted to capture the minutes of meeting or wanted to search for a phrase discussed in the meeting. It would be impossible without the content as the meeting would went for hours. This feature might be useful as only few AI speech to text is in the top rank - few are google cloud vision, otter.ai , IBM Voice etc.,

kerem

2026-02-27 15:55:43 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
wontfix
label

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:55:44 +03:00

Author

Owner

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 19, 2019):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 19, 2019): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.