[GH-ISSUE #142] Not open source #139

Closed
opened 2026-02-27 15:55:15 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @filerun on GitHub (Apr 2, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/RD17/ambar/issues/142

Why do you call it open source if important parts of its code are not available?

Originally created by @filerun on GitHub (Apr 2, 2018). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/RD17/ambar/issues/142 Why do you call it open source if important parts of its code are not available?
kerem closed this issue 2026-02-27 15:55:15 +03:00
Author
Owner

@isido993 commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2018):

@filerun What's your point?

<!-- gh-comment-id:377953344 --> @isido993 commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2018): @filerun What's your point?
Author
Owner

@sochix commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2018):

@filerun now it's MIT, so I close the issue

<!-- gh-comment-id:382655171 --> @sochix commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2018): @filerun now it's MIT, so I close the issue
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/ambar#139
No description provided.