mirror of
https://github.com/nektos/act.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:15:51 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #569] Enhancement: Support publishing ports to host OS #382
Labels
No labels
area/action
area/cli
area/docs
area/image
area/runner
area/workflow
backlog
confirmed/not-planned
kind/bug
kind/discussion
kind/external
kind/feature-request
kind/question
meta/duplicate
meta/invalid
meta/need-more-info
meta/resolved
meta/wontfix
meta/workaround
needs-work
pull-request
review/not-planned
size/M
size/XL
size/XXL
stale
stale-exempt
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/act#382
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @bixu on GitHub (Mar 17, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/nektos/act/issues/569
Port publishing similar to Docker's
--publishflagHere's a specific use-case from my org: we run a JUnit test suite in GH Actions, and were trying to debug an issue with suite using Act, but this was difficult because the JVM remote debugger listens on a port inside the Act container and wasn't easily accessible to our dev toolset. If the maintainers would be open to adding port publishing with a flag like
--publish(following Docker conventions), we'd might be able to open a PR around this.CC: @olga-casian
@jsoref commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2021):
The maintainers might be open to this (it doesn't seem terribly unreasonable).
Note that there are ways that should work today:
I haven't tried any of these. I ran across someone offering a tunnel for GHA recently. I'm still trying to get my action to basically work in act, let alone fancy stuff.
Do note that you can run
docker execto connect to the running container, so you could probably bolt something on using some localncs too.@bixu commented on GitHub (Apr 9, 2021):
@calleb-sumup
@mzagaja commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2022):
After going through a large debugging adventure with some actions today, adding this feature would be a big win for my developer experience in order to be able to connect a remote debugger to my test suite through TCP.