mirror of
https://github.com/nektos/act.git
synced 2026-04-26 09:25:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2685] Invalid network names on podman #1213
Labels
No labels
area/action
area/cli
area/docs
area/image
area/runner
area/workflow
backlog
confirmed/not-planned
kind/bug
kind/discussion
kind/external
kind/feature-request
kind/question
meta/duplicate
meta/invalid
meta/need-more-info
meta/resolved
meta/wontfix
meta/workaround
needs-work
pull-request
review/not-planned
size/M
size/XL
size/XXL
stale
stale-exempt
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/act#1213
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @rhbvkleef on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/nektos/act/issues/2685
I am running a Forgejo runner (which uses act under the hood) in conjunction with Podman. In general this works fine, but there's an issue with creating network names if the
job-id's have spaces in them. The issue appears to occur here. Specifically, Podman requires network names to conform to the regex[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_.-]*, but obviously, if thejob-idcontains one or more spaces, this will not be the case.I've already submitted a bug report for Forgejo Runner, and that contains more information on how exactly I am running it.
I'm sorry for this slightly unconventional bug report, but I couldn't really fit it in the common bug template, as I'm not running act directly.
Software versions
I am running:
code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner:6.2.2Podman
Workflow Content
Relevant Log Output
@ChristopherHX commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):
This is an invalid workflow file per GitHub Actions Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_id
I would turn this issue more towards, missing job-id validation of forgejo.
Please verify that issues you open here can be reproduced on our side.
jobs like this are early failed