[GH-ISSUE #191] Source tarball incomplete? #82

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-13 15:42:57 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-13 15:42:57 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @danb35 on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns/issues/191

The 0.8 source tarball is 46KB, and extracts into 220KB uncompressed. By comparison, the 0.7.2 source tarball was 16MB, and a git clone of this repo is 27MB uncompressed. Is there something missing from the 0.8 tarball, or does the git clone just include a lot of unnecessary stuff?

Originally created by @danb35 on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns/issues/191 The 0.8 source tarball is 46KB, and extracts into 220KB uncompressed. By comparison, the 0.7.2 source tarball was 16MB, and a `git clone` of this repo is 27MB uncompressed. Is there something missing from the 0.8 tarball, or does the `git clone` just include a lot of unnecessary stuff?

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-13 15:43:02 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-13 15:43:08 +03:00

Author

Owner

@joohoi commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019):

There certainly is stuff missing, however - on purpose. Acme-dns was migrated over to Go 1.13 and gomodules in #187 and in the process I nuked the vendor directory where all the dependencies were saved. Closing this as resolved, but feel free to let me know you don't agree and we'll reopen the issue.

@joohoi commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2019): There certainly is stuff missing, however - on purpose. Acme-dns was migrated over to Go 1.13 and gomodules in #187 and in the process I nuked the `vendor` directory where all the dependencies were saved. Closing this as resolved, but feel free to let me know you don't agree and we'll reopen the issue.

kerem commented

2026-03-13 15:43:13 +03:00

Author

Owner

@danb35 commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2019):

I just thought it was sure to be an error when it was that much smaller than it used to be, but so much the better. I'm having trouble building a RPM from my old .spec file, but I'm green enough that it's probably a different error on my part.

@danb35 commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2019): I just thought it was sure to be an error when it was that much smaller than it used to be, but so much the better. I'm having trouble building a RPM from my old .spec file, but I'm green enough that it's probably a different error on my part.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-13 16:15:29 +03:00

[PR #84] [CLOSED] create non-world-readable files (#82) #284

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-13 16:15:29 +03:00

[PR #86] [CLOSED] create non-world-readable files (#82) #285

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-13 16:16:02 +03:00

[PR #102] [MERGED] Umask 0077 for acme-dns process #295