starred/acme-dns-client
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns-client.git synced 2026-04-25 21:35:57 +03:00
Code Issues 20 Projects Releases 3 Packages Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #9] Recommendation vs joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi #5

New issue
Open
opened 2026-03-13 16:23:51 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments
kerem commented 2026-03-13 16:23:51 +03:00
Owner
Copy link

Originally created by @crisperdue on GitHub (Jun 23, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns-client/issues/9

Question: Do you now recommend this software versus joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi?
They appear to be direct alternatives, or is that incorrect?

Thanks!

Originally created by @crisperdue on GitHub (Jun 23, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns-client/issues/9 Question: Do you now recommend this software versus joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi? They appear to be direct alternatives, or is that incorrect? Thanks!
kerem commented 2026-03-13 16:23:56 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@joohoi commented on GitHub (Jun 23, 2021):

They are direct alternatives, you are right. And yes, this was written to
replace the python wrapper.

This client addresses many shortcomigs of acme-dns-certbot-joohoi

On Wed 23. Jun 2021 at 22.54, Cris Perdue @.***> wrote:

Question: Do you now recommend this software versus
joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi?
They appear to be direct alternatives, or is that incorrect?

Thanks!

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns-client/issues/9, or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABH6DJOOIJBIFEV2SBVHLQ3TUI3XFANCNFSM47GPDJ2Q
.

<!-- gh-comment-id:867126713 --> @joohoi commented on GitHub (Jun 23, 2021): They are direct alternatives, you are right. And yes, this was written to replace the python wrapper. This client addresses many shortcomigs of acme-dns-certbot-joohoi On Wed 23. Jun 2021 at 22.54, Cris Perdue ***@***.***> wrote: > Question: Do you now recommend this software versus > joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi? > They appear to be direct alternatives, or is that incorrect? > > Thanks! > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns-client/issues/9>, or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABH6DJOOIJBIFEV2SBVHLQ3TUI3XFANCNFSM47GPDJ2Q> > . >
kerem commented 2026-03-13 16:24:02 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@crisperdue commented on GitHub (Jun 23, 2021):

Thanks much, that is very helpful info.

For what it's worth, there is a tutorial on using the old Python version,
at https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-acquire-a-let-s-encrypt-certificate-using-dns-validation-with-acme-dns-certbot-on-ubuntu-18-04.

Perhaps the author would be interested in creating an updated tutorial when you feel your new software is ready for more widespread use.

<!-- gh-comment-id:867141760 --> @crisperdue commented on GitHub (Jun 23, 2021): Thanks much, that is very helpful info. For what it's worth, there is a tutorial on using the old Python version, at https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-acquire-a-let-s-encrypt-certificate-using-dns-validation-with-acme-dns-certbot-on-ubuntu-18-04. Perhaps the author would be interested in creating an updated tutorial when you feel your new software is ready for more widespread use.
kerem commented 2026-03-13 16:24:07 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@oblitum commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

By looking at old Python code version, it seems to avoid issue #13:

It's a problematic issue with the new go client which may affect usage with most registrars when attempting to obtain a wildcard certificate.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1024187915 --> @oblitum commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): By looking at old Python code version, it seems to avoid issue #13: - https://github.com/joohoi/acme-dns-certbot-joohoi/blob/908aefb0ea3925aaeaf78a7ca32e6a526b1bb563/acme-dns-auth.py#L122-L123 It's a problematic issue with the new go client which may affect usage with most registrars when attempting to obtain a wildcard certificate.
kerem commented 2026-03-13 16:24:12 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@joohoi commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

That's a good observation @oblitum , I'll fix that in Go client!

<!-- gh-comment-id:1024219957 --> @joohoi commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): That's a good observation @oblitum , I'll fix that in Go client!
kerem commented 2026-03-13 16:24:17 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@joohoi commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

...and it's fixed

<!-- gh-comment-id:1024242971 --> @joohoi commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): ...and it's fixed
kerem commented 2026-03-13 16:24:22 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@lonix1 commented on GitHub (Jun 14, 2022):

Does this new client have dockerised deployment or must we manage scripts etc. manually? (Sorry, I'm new to this, but long-time user of certbot.)

<!-- gh-comment-id:1154870596 --> @lonix1 commented on GitHub (Jun 14, 2022): Does this new client have dockerised deployment or must we manage scripts etc. manually? (Sorry, I'm new to this, but long-time user of certbot.)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
release03
fix_wildcard
fix_goreleaser
prepare_v0.2
v0.3
v0.2
v0.1
Labels
Clear labels   
pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

  
question

   
question
No labels
pull-request
question
question
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/acme-dns-client#5
No description provided.