mirror of
https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager.git
synced 2026-04-27 17:15:53 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #559] WM w/parameters & Custom IP problem #469
Labels
No labels
📶 WiFi
🕸️ HTTP
Branch
DEV Help Wanted
Discussion
Documentation
ESP32
Example
Good First Issue
Hotfix
In Progress
Incomplete
Needs Feeback
Priority
QA
Question
Task
Upstream/Dependancy
bug
duplicate
enhancement
invalid
pull-request
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/WiFiManager#469
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @mrlightsman on GitHub (Mar 14, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager/issues/559
I am trying to set the custom ip using the master branch example. I am using the code unedited except for my own parameters. The main sketch is using kokappa ‘s sinric sketch to control Alexa devices and udp for some packet communications.
Hardware is an ESP01. Build environment is latest Arduino ide.
The first time the esp connects to Wi-Fi (after initial config portal) everything runs as expected. However, if I do an on demand portal call, all the parameters, including ip, gw, sn are all in place. But when I save the config The ESP stops responding to sinric commands received via websockets. The device continues to work and receive udp packets as expected.
I do not change the ip when I do the reset, I merely want to see the address so I can send udp packets to it.
If I comment out the custom ip parts of the WM code, everything runs as expected. Even after reset.
Also, the ESP seems to leave the ap mode running for several minutes after leaving the config page. Even though the sketch is running.
It was suggested I might be running out of memory. Program memory uses 87% but dynamic memory is only using 48%. So I don’t think this is the case. But people far smarter than me have offered it as a suggestion.
I apologize for not posting my code. I am not at my computer at the moment.
All help is appreciated. Thank you.
@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2018):
You didn't fill out the form. try dev branch