mirror of
https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager.git
synced 2026-04-27 09:05:56 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #491] wifiManager.setSTAStaticIPConfig sink telegram connection #410
Labels
No labels
📶 WiFi
🕸️ HTTP
Branch
DEV Help Wanted
Discussion
Documentation
ESP32
Example
Good First Issue
Hotfix
In Progress
Incomplete
Needs Feeback
Priority
QA
Question
Task
Upstream/Dependancy
bug
duplicate
enhancement
invalid
pull-request
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/WiFiManager#410
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @plcabgut on GitHub (Jan 24, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager/issues/491
hello
when i use wifimanager with static ip in this way
IPAddress ip (192, 168, 1, 59);
IPAddress gateway(192, 168, 1, 1);
IPAddress mask (255, 255, 255, 0);
The esp8266 nodemcu with static ip don't receives nothing from telegram using the universaltelegrambot library.
If I let wifimanager in dhcp mode then it works fine and receives every command from telelegram.
There might be an interaction between them I guess.
After several days trying diferents configurations i've found that with this instruction everything go wrong. it lost the connection.
I think that could be because of the secure client. but I'm not sure.
The instruction wifiManager.setSTAStaticIPConfig(ip, gateway, mask); works great indeed because it put the ip statically right but then the other library doesnt works properly
@evbelda commented on GitHub (Apr 12, 2018):
Please, can you tell me why this issue is closed? There are any other thread solved about it?
I'm detecting same problem with WifiManager 0.12 and UniversalTelegrambot 1.1.0 and static IP
@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Apr 12, 2018):
Because there is no information about which esp lib or attempt to remove wifimanager and test with a basic esp static example. Also there is now a development branch to test against