mirror of
https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager.git
synced 2026-04-27 00:55:52 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1493] error: 'base64' has not been declared #1273
Labels
No labels
📶 WiFi
🕸️ HTTP
Branch
DEV Help Wanted
Discussion
Documentation
ESP32
Example
Good First Issue
Hotfix
In Progress
Incomplete
Needs Feeback
Priority
QA
Question
Task
Upstream/Dependancy
bug
duplicate
enhancement
invalid
pull-request
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/WiFiManager#1273
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @LouisLee985 on GitHub (Sep 14, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tzapu/WiFiManager/issues/1493
Basic Infos
Hardware
WiFimanager Branch/Release: Master
Esp8285
Hardware: ESP-01f
Core Version: 2.4.0, staging
Description
The same code compile in arduino is ok.
But in platformio,there error.
Thanks.
Settings in IDE
Module: NodeMcu
Debug Messages
@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2022):
This seems to be a platform bug, or removed for size for the 8285? Either way not sure how I can fix other than to add a workaround. Maybe try to set
wm.setScanDispPerc(true);to disable the images@LouisLee985 commented on GitHub (Sep 15, 2022):
Change board 8285 ESP-01f to nodemcuv2, and add
wm.setScanDispPerc(true);The error remains.It seems to be a platform bug like you say.
So edit code in PlatformIO IDE and compile it in Arduino IDE.
Thanks.
@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Sep 15, 2022):
Yeah thats odd, or maybe you have duplicate library for webserver that is old, or need to wipe esp8266 platform
@LouisLee985 commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2022):
It's fixed:
https://github.com/Mixiaoxiao/Arduino-HomeKit-ESP8266/pull/183/commits/ae4780e05cc1faa424baf9beb4aa96a0d181f896
Thanks.
@tablatronix commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2022):
cool, so its a naming conflict