[GH-ISSUE #51] SHR (not an issue) #3

Closed
opened 2026-03-07 19:21:33 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @jjvelar on GitHub (Jun 1, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/007revad/Synology_SHR_switch/issues/51

Originally assigned to: @007revad on GitHub.

Hi @007revad,

Thanks for providing these scripts. Much appreciated.

I am currently using a RAID1 configuration but plan to add additional drives so your script allows me to consider migrating to RAID5 or SHR.

How dows this work? I mean, I am not an expert user but Synology does not allow to move from RAID to SHR, so was wondering which kind of sorcery :-) are you using, and which will be the process.

Thanks in advance for your help and support.

Originally created by @jjvelar on GitHub (Jun 1, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/007revad/Synology_SHR_switch/issues/51 Originally assigned to: @007revad on GitHub. Hi @007revad, Thanks for providing these scripts. Much appreciated. I am currently using a RAID1 configuration but plan to add additional drives so your script allows me to consider migrating to RAID5 or SHR. How dows this work? I mean, I am not an expert user but Synology does not allow to move from RAID to SHR, so was wondering which kind of sorcery :-) are you using, and which will be the process. Thanks in advance for your help and support.
kerem closed this issue 2026-03-07 19:21:33 +03:00
Author
Owner

@007revad commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2024):

The script doesn't allow changing an existing RAID 5 storage pool to SHR, or vice versa. It only enables the option to create an SHR storage pool on enterprise models that don't have SHR.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2143588670 --> @007revad commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2024): The script doesn't allow changing an existing RAID 5 storage pool to SHR, or vice versa. It only enables the option to create an SHR storage pool on enterprise models that don't have SHR.
Author
Owner

@jjvelar commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2024):

Oh, I see.
Thanks for clarifying.

On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 11:02 PM Dave Russell @.***>
wrote:

The script doesn't allow changing an existing RAID 5 storage pool to SHR,
or vice versa. It only enables the option to create an SHR storage pool on
enterprise models that don't have SHR.


Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/007revad/Synology_SHR_switch/issues/51#issuecomment-2143588670,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALKMG4QEJR7Q5TGI4JPIE2DZFIZGPAVCNFSM6AAAAABIUI2E5CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNBTGU4DQNRXGA
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

<!-- gh-comment-id:2143596004 --> @jjvelar commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2024): Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying. On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 11:02 PM Dave Russell ***@***.***> wrote: > The script doesn't allow changing an existing RAID 5 storage pool to SHR, > or vice versa. It only enables the option to create an SHR storage pool on > enterprise models that don't have SHR. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/007revad/Synology_SHR_switch/issues/51#issuecomment-2143588670>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALKMG4QEJR7Q5TGI4JPIE2DZFIZGPAVCNFSM6AAAAABIUI2E5CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNBTGU4DQNRXGA> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Synology_SHR_switch#3
No description provided.