[GH-ISSUE #366] Drive temperature broken #628

Open
opened 2026-03-11 12:44:52 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Ubsefor on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db/issues/366

The script somehow breaks synology drive temperature reporting, it gets stuck at 29C constantly, while smartmontools report correct temperature

Originally created by @Ubsefor on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db/issues/366 The script somehow breaks synology drive temperature reporting, it gets stuck at 29C constantly, while smartmontools report correct temperature
Author
Owner

@007revad commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024):

Do you mean smartctl?

Which Synology model and DSM version?

<!-- gh-comment-id:2415282688 --> @007revad commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024): Do you mean smartctl? Which Synology model and DSM version?
Author
Owner

@Ubsefor commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024):

Do you mean smartctl?

Yes, smartctl -a /dev/block | grep "Temp" shows correct temperature, its also shown correctly in "scrutiny"
Right now I’m patching synodrivedb.db by hand, we'll see if that will help

UPD: It did not, I believe this is due to model.dtb edits; drive info also contains firmware version, which it did not have before the patch

Which Synology model and DSM version?

SA6400, 7.2.2-72806

<!-- gh-comment-id:2415288245 --> @Ubsefor commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024): > Do you mean smartctl? Yes, smartctl -a /dev/block | grep "Temp" shows correct temperature, its also shown correctly in "scrutiny" Right now I’m patching synodrivedb.db by hand, we'll see if that will help UPD: It did not, I believe this is due to model.dtb edits; drive info also contains firmware version, which it did not have before the patch > Which Synology model and DSM version? SA6400, 7.2.2-72806
Author
Owner

@007revad commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024):

syno_hdd_db only edits model.dtb if the script detects a E10M20-T1, M2D20, M2D18 or M2D17 connected to a NAS model that does not officially support them and the E10M20-T1, M2D20, M2D18 or M2D17 is not already in model.dtb.

So the script would not touch model.dtb on a SA6400

<!-- gh-comment-id:2415342051 --> @007revad commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024): syno_hdd_db only edits model.dtb if the script detects a E10M20-T1, M2D20, M2D18 or M2D17 connected to a NAS model that does not officially support them and the E10M20-T1, M2D20, M2D18 or M2D17 is not already in model.dtb. So the script would not touch model.dtb on a SA6400
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Synology_HDD_db#628
No description provided.