mirror of
https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db.git
synced 2026-04-25 13:45:59 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #567] M.2 SATA SSD in M2D18 is treated as internal SSD #210
Labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/Synology_HDD_db#210
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @steinreiter on GitHub (Feb 20, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db/issues/567
I purchased a DS1517+ (DSM 7.3.2) with an M2D18 PCIe card as a backup device. The DS1517+ only supports M.2 SATA SSDs in the M2D18 slot. The system incorrectly attempts to configure these m.2 SATA Drives using Write-Mostly. An error message also appears beforehand because the nvme command is not available on the DS1517+ due to a lack of support. It would be helpful to check if the nvme tool is present before running it.
Here is the log of the execution (drive data anonymized):
@007revad commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2026):
Thanks. The script should not be trying to set write_mostly for any M.2 drives, or trying to get the vendor id for SATA M.2 drives using the nvme comand.
Does this command show the M.2 SATA drive as well as the HDDs? You don't have to mask the model numbers. Only drive serials should be masked - and this command does not show the serial numbers.
@007revad commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2026):
This version should have fixed both errors.
https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db/releases/tag/v3.6.124
@steinreiter commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2026):
No, this command does not show the M.2 SATA drives.
Thanks, this version fixed it.