[GH-ISSUE #508 ] installation #110

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

i can't seem to find the next step of what to do

Once you have configured everything, just run the SignTools server, then navigate to the corresponding IP address and port that you configured. The SignTools UI is entirely web based, so all usage happens in a browser.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): > i can't seem to find the next step of what to do Once you have configured everything, just run the SignTools server, then navigate to the corresponding IP address and port that you configured. The SignTools UI is entirely web based, so all usage happens in a browser.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

i can't seem to find the next step of what to do

Once you have configured everything, just run the SignTools server, then navigate to the corresponding IP address and port that you configured. The SignTools UI is entirely web based, so all usage happens in a browser.

how do i run the sign tools server? i've so far done this can you help image

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): > > i can't seem to find the next step of what to do > > > > Once you have configured everything, just run the SignTools server, then navigate to the corresponding IP address and port that you configured. The SignTools UI is entirely web based, so all usage happens in a browser. how do i run the sign tools server? i've so far done this can you help ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72f44eec-03a3-45dd-97a3-cf2b33c6ea4e)[image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cd6ba48b-ba2c-49e3-81e0-654e47ce80de)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

i'm not sure which of these web service executions to do i've also done this!

removed for privacy

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): i'm not sure which of these web service executions to do i've also done this! _removed for privacy_

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

I removed your config picture for privacy since it contained your GitHub API token. Please change it ASAP.

To start the server, just run SignTools_3.0.5_windows_amd64.exe or equivalent for your operating system.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): I removed your config picture for privacy since it contained your GitHub API token. Please change it ASAP. To start the server, just run [SignTools_3.0.5_windows_amd64.exe](https://github.com/SignTools/SignTools/releases/download/v3.0.5/SignTools_3.0.5_windows_amd64.exe) or equivalent for your operating system.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

okay thank you when i try and run it it doesn't do anything it just exits

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): okay thank you when i try and run it it doesn't do anything it just exits

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

Run it from Terminal / Command Prompt, that way any message it prints won't immediately disappear. It probably exits due to an error.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): Run it from Terminal / Command Prompt, that way any message it prints won't immediately disappear. It probably exits due to an error.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

how do i explicitly select sign tools to run in cmd

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): how do i explicitly select sign tools to run in cmd

kerem commented

https://www.wikihow.com/Run-a-Program-on-Command-Prompt

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): https://www.wikihow.com/Run-a-Program-on-Command-Prompt

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

this is what i get

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): this is what i get ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/98a82b8d-1478-403f-a3a7-54be24b58267)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

You need two separate commands, try this and press Enter after each line:

cd C:\Users\Azeem\Downloads
start SignTools_3.0.5_windows_amd64

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): You need two separate commands, try this and press `Enter` after each line: ``` cd C:\Users\Azeem\Downloads start SignTools_3.0.5_windows_amd64 ```

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

it just sits there when i enter it

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): it just sits there when i enter it![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c081f834-7382-4f4d-8854-c4e3fdc1c46e)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

Can you try without start? Just SignTools_3.0.5_windows_amd64.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): Can you try without `start`? Just `SignTools_3.0.5_windows_amd64`.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

that seems to give me this error image

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): that seems to give me this error [image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e25e9da3-7822-4336-be85-4148b355bc47)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

Cool, this is some progress. You need to follow the file names exactly. Your .p12 file is named "krava39.p12", it needs to be named cert.p12. Same for the other files.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): Cool, this is some progress. You need to follow the file names exactly. Your .p12 file is named "krava39.p12", it needs to be named cert.p12. Same for the other files.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

i've changed all of them to match however i'm still getting the same error

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): i've changed all of them to match however i'm still getting the same error

kerem commented

https://www.autodesk.com/support/technical/article/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/How-to-enable-hidden-file-extensions-in-Windows.html

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

I noticed your Windows settings hide the file extensions by default. If you type "cert.p12" and the file type is already p12, you will end up with "cert.p12.p12", which is invalid. Please enable the setting to show file extensions and make sure they align with that on.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): I noticed your Windows settings hide the file extensions by default. If you type "cert.p12" and the file type is already p12, you will end up with "cert.p12.p12", which is invalid. Please enable the setting to show file extensions and make sure they align with that on. https://www.autodesk.com/support/technical/article/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/How-to-enable-hidden-file-extensions-in-Windows.html

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024):

thank you this is where it stops now image

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2024): thank you this is where it stops now [image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b3bcaf8d-5ec1-42ed-9e3c-310c3036be74)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2024):

You can now access the web UI by opening http://localhost:8080 in your browser.

Note however, from the config you showed before, signing will NOT work. As written in the docs, the address you put in "server_url" needs to be reachable by the builder. You have put localhost there, which means the builder (GitHub's server) will just try to connect to itself, which won't work. You need to expose your computer's port 8080 to the builder somehow. Read section "4b. Tunnel provider" carefully, it describes an easy way to do that.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2024): You can now access the web UI by opening http://localhost:8080 in your browser. Note however, from the config you showed before, signing will NOT work. As written in the docs, the address you put in "server_url" needs to be reachable by the builder. You have put localhost there, which means the builder (GitHub's server) will just try to connect to itself, which won't work. You need to expose your computer's port 8080 to the builder somehow. Read section "4b. Tunnel provider" carefully, it describes an easy way to do that.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2024):

does this mean that it has worked

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2024): does this mean that it has worked ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5577274-4597-48aa-8e46-730304696259)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2024):

it shows me this

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2024): it shows me this ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a7d0bc3-ecb9-444a-8cb1-f5c1b67a4fbf)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024):

I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it?

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024): I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it? <img width="656" alt="Unrecognized code signing certificate" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/967c1f89-eae9-4f55-9969-06cb749dac55" />

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024):

I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it?

nope i didn't get any further help but i was trying to get a side loaded app to work like a normal app in terms of ios widgets and i found one way to make it work

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024): > I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it? > > > > <img width="656" alt="Unrecognized code signing certificate" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/967c1f89-eae9-4f55-9969-06cb749dac55" /> > > nope i didn't get any further help but i was trying to get a side loaded app to work like a normal app in terms of ios widgets and i found one way to make it work

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024):

I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it?

nope i didn't get any further help but i was trying to get a side loaded app to work like a normal app in terms of ios widgets and i found one way to make it work

That's what I need too. How did you make it?

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024): > > I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it? > > <img alt="Unrecognized code signing certificate" width="656" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/62780323/399275512-967c1f89-eae9-4f55-9969-06cb749dac55.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Z341cBBbG2GK58YBPV4oyjnJGjQmoVESX2cDw783gB0"> > > nope i didn't get any further help but i was trying to get a side loaded app to work like a normal app in terms of ios widgets and i found one way to make it work That's what I need too. How did you make it?

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it?

I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps:
https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad
Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer."

So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements)

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it? > <img alt="Unrecognized code signing certificate" width="656" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/62780323/399275512-967c1f89-eae9-4f55-9969-06cb749dac55.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Ea9B4sos-yYOGdfU3D3M87WCq96A6hTxq5DJAEoTEhQ"> I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps: https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer." So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements)

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it?

I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps:

https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad

Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer."

So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements)

i presume we need a developer account to make it use the entitlements of carplay and then we needa write it in ourselves i think the same applies for siri

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it? > > > <img alt="Unrecognized code signing certificate" width="656" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/62780323/399275512-967c1f89-eae9-4f55-9969-06cb749dac55.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MzU2MDM0NDUsIm5iZiI6MTczNTYwMzE0NSwicGF0aCI6Ii82Mjc4MDMyMy8zOTkyNzU1MTItOTY3YzFmODktZWFlOS00ZjU1LTk5NjktMDZjYjc0OWRhYzU1LnBuZz9YLUFtei1BbGdvcml0aG09QVdTNC1ITUFDLVNIQTI1NiZYLUFtei1DcmVkZW50aWFsPUFLSUFWQ09EWUxTQTUzUFFLNFpBJTJGMjAyNDEyMzAlMkZ1cy1lYXN0LTElMkZzMyUyRmF3czRfcmVxdWVzdCZYLUFtei1EYXRlPTIwMjQxMjMwVDIzNTkwNVomWC1BbXotRXhwaXJlcz0zMDAmWC1BbXotU2lnbmF0dXJlPWI1ZjVjMzFhYzY0Yzc2Y2YzMTk0MWJmMzRmN2Y0MGI1MWQxMDQ0NDQ4NjI0MjZiNGYyMWNhNTlkMTNmNDVhNDEmWC1BbXotU2lnbmVkSGVhZGVycz1ob3N0In0.Ea9B4sos-yYOGdfU3D3M87WCq96A6hTxq5DJAEoTEhQ"> > > > > I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps: > > https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad > > Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer." > > > > So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements) i presume we need a developer account to make it use the entitlements of carplay and then we needa write it in ourselves i think the same applies for siri

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it?

I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps:
https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad
Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer."
So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements)

i presume we need a developer account to make it use the entitlements of carplay and then we needa write it in ourselves i think the same applies for siri

you also have to submit a form explaining why you need access to Carplay. So, a developer account is not enough...

@bostok8 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > > I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it? > > > > > > > <img alt="Unrecognized code signing certificate" width="656" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/62780323/399275512-967c1f89-eae9-4f55-9969-06cb749dac55.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Ea9B4sos-yYOGdfU3D3M87WCq96A6hTxq5DJAEoTEhQ"> > > > > > > I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps: > > https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad > > Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer." > > So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements) > > i presume we need a developer account to make it use the entitlements of carplay and then we needa write it in ourselves i think the same applies for siri you also have to submit a form explaining why you need access to Carplay. So, a developer account is not enough...

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it?

I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps:

https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad

Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer."

So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements)

i presume we need a developer account to make it use the entitlements of carplay and then we needa write it in ourselves i think the same applies for siri

you also have to submit a form explaining why you need access to Carplay. So, a developer account is not enough...

you need a developer account then explaining why you need it which is already quite long but the first step would be to have a developer account im pretty sure so you can request the entitlements

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > > > I think I'm getting the same error 401. Did you solve it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > <img alt="Unrecognized code signing certificate" width="656" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/62780323/399275512-967c1f89-eae9-4f55-9969-06cb749dac55.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MzU2MDM0NDUsIm5iZiI6MTczNTYwMzE0NSwicGF0aCI6Ii82Mjc4MDMyMy8zOTkyNzU1MTItOTY3YzFmODktZWFlOS00ZjU1LTk5NjktMDZjYjc0OWRhYzU1LnBuZz9YLUFtei1BbGdvcml0aG09QVdTNC1ITUFDLVNIQTI1NiZYLUFtei1DcmVkZW50aWFsPUFLSUFWQ09EWUxTQTUzUFFLNFpBJTJGMjAyNDEyMzAlMkZ1cy1lYXN0LTElMkZzMyUyRmF3czRfcmVxdWVzdCZYLUFtei1EYXRlPTIwMjQxMjMwVDIzNTkwNVomWC1BbXotRXhwaXJlcz0zMDAmWC1BbXotU2lnbmF0dXJlPWI1ZjVjMzFhYzY0Yzc2Y2YzMTk0MWJmMzRmN2Y0MGI1MWQxMDQ0NDQ4NjI0MjZiNGYyMWNhNTlkMTNmNDVhNDEmWC1BbXotU2lnbmVkSGVhZGVycz1ob3N0In0.Ea9B4sos-yYOGdfU3D3M87WCq96A6hTxq5DJAEoTEhQ"> > > > > > > > > > > > > I realized the certificate wasn't right. I made it work following these steps: > > > > https://gist.github.com/boodle/77436b2d9facb8e938ad > > > > Take into account after 6. it's necessary to rename "development.cer" to "ios_enterprise.cer." > > > > So, I solve this problem, but anyway, I can't activate Carplay in the app because I don't have Carplay entitlements... (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/carplay/requesting-carplay-entitlements) > > > > > > i presume we need a developer account to make it use the entitlements of carplay and then we needa write it in ourselves i think the same applies for siri > > > > you also have to submit a form explaining why you need access to Carplay. So, a developer account is not enough... you need a developer account then explaining why you need it which is already quite long but the first step would be to have a developer account im pretty sure so you can request the entitlements

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

i personally don't know but is that how it works?

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks i personally don't know but is that how it works?

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

i personally don't know but is that how it works?

I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island.

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks > > i personally don't know but is that how it works? I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

i personally don't know but is that how it works?

I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island.

then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > > Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks > > > > > > i personally don't know but is that how it works? > > > > I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island. then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

i personally don't know but is that how it works?

I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island.

then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device

if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert.

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > > > Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i personally don't know but is that how it works? > > > > > > I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island. > > then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

i personally don't know but is that how it works?

I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island.

then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device

if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert.

i hope they follow suit soon i've been waiting for that feature for quite some time and with a little help it'd be the best of both worlds or both side i mean

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > > > > Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i personally don't know but is that how it works? > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island. > > > > > > then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device > > > > if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert. i hope they follow suit soon i've been waiting for that feature for quite some time and with a little help it'd be the best of both worlds or both side i mean

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

i personally don't know but is that how it works?

I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island.

then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device

if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert.

i hope they follow suit soon i've been waiting for that feature for quite some time and with a little help it'd be the best of both worlds or both side i mean

Wish this could be push forward to the devs of the Signtools maybe they can find a workaround.

@coolopj commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > > > > > Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i personally don't know but is that how it works? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device > > > > > > if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert. > > i hope they follow suit soon i've been waiting for that feature for quite some time and with a little help it'd be the best of both worlds or both side i mean Wish this could be push forward to the devs of the Signtools maybe they can find a workaround.

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks

i personally don't know but is that how it works?

I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island.

then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device

if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert.

i hope they follow suit soon i've been waiting for that feature for quite some time and with a little help it'd be the best of both worlds or both side i mean

Wish this could be push forward to the devs of the Signtools maybe they can find a workaround.

hopefully one of the devs can see this and possibly implement it

@J2TR1PPY commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): > > > > > > > Great work! I really enjoy using the app. I want to ask if it's possible for signtools to sign ipa using the option [Use provisioning profile's application ID] the way Sideloadly does by adding the explicit provisional profile after the real bundle ID for example , com.spotify.client.C5678X786. with that more than one app can be installed at once using the option. Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i personally don't know but is that how it works? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that's how it works because app signed with signtools using the option provisional profile has a unique bundle ID that's why it can't support multiple apps installation because there is no difference, it will definitely override the app previously installed because they both has the same Bundle ID. I've installed three apps using sideloady and they never override each other but they have thesame alphanumeric unique code at the of the real bundle ID like I indicated earlier and they work perfectly and can be launched from Lock Screen and dynamic island. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then i feel using the alphanumeric code at the end is the way to get the apps to work in harmony w ios and not fight over eachother because when trying todo it manually only one app can make use of all ios features as others would try replace it i dont know how signtools and others make it work but they make it work with that last bit after the bundle id to specify it to work with ios for your device > > > > > > > > > > > > if signtools could follow the pattern of sideloady it would have been the best of the best app to sign ipa because with signtools, apps installation is not limited to just 3 apps and it's taking forever for Sideloadly to add support for Dev cert. > > > > > > i hope they follow suit soon i've been waiting for that feature for quite some time and with a little help it'd be the best of both worlds or both side i mean > > > > Wish this could be push forward to the devs of the Signtools maybe they can find a workaround. hopefully one of the devs can see this and possibly implement it

kerem commented

Author

Owner

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024):

This is getting off topic from the original issue. Can you please create a separate issue for the feature request and describe it in full detail? I'm happy to look into a new identifier naming scheme if it would be truly useful.

@ViRb3 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2024): This is getting off topic from the original issue. Can you please create a separate issue for the feature request and describe it in full detail? I'm happy to look into a new identifier naming scheme if it would be truly useful.

kerem commented