[GH-ISSUE #71] V3.6 and Office 2013 : issue with pictures and src value in htm file #23

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 20:30:51 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 20:30:51 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Imaginos on GitHub (Feb 20, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Set-OutlookSignatures/Set-OutlookSignatures/issues/71

Hi Markus
Since version 3.6, I notice an issue on PC with Office 2013.

Templates are docx files.
With 2013, pictures are in a separate folder, "Signature.htm + Signature.files/"
Pictures are called in the htm file with the "src" attribute.
Here are the differences between src attribute in htm generated file:

V3.51 : src="Signature.files/image002.png" 👍
V3.6 : src="1592677f-8f19-4360-81b3-83162ebdeefeHighRes_fichiers/image002.png" 👎

Of course, there is no folder nammed 1592677f-8f19-4360-81b3-83162ebdeefeHighRes_fichiers
With Office 2016, pics are integrated in the htm file, so it's OK.

I had to roll back to v 3.51.

If you need more infos, just ask.

Regards
Tom

Originally created by @Imaginos on GitHub (Feb 20, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Set-OutlookSignatures/Set-OutlookSignatures/issues/71 Hi Markus Since version 3.6, I notice an issue on PC with Office 2013. Templates are docx files. With 2013, pictures are in a separate folder, "Signature.htm + Signature.files/" Pictures are called in the htm file with the "src" attribute. Here are the differences between src attribute in htm generated file: - V3.51 : src="Signature.files/image002.png" 👍 - V3.6 : src="1592677f-8f19-4360-81b3-83162ebdeefeHighRes_fichiers/image002.png" 👎 Of course, there is no folder nammed 1592677f-8f19-4360-81b3-83162ebdeefeHighRes_fichiers With Office 2016, pics are integrated in the htm file, so it's OK. I had to roll back to v 3.51. If you need more infos, just ask. Regards Tom

kerem closed this issue

2026-02-27 20:30:51 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-27 20:30:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@GruberMarkus commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2023):

Hi @Imaginos,

thanks for bringing up this issue.

The root cause has been found and corrected, the solution will be included in the v4.0.0 release.

@GruberMarkus commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2023): Hi @Imaginos, thanks for bringing up this issue. The root cause has been found and corrected, the solution will be included in the v4.0.0 release.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 20:30:52 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Imaginos commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2023):

Great !

Thanks

@Imaginos commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2023): Great ! Thanks

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-27 20:31:12 +03:00

[PR #23] [MERGED] Bump gittools/actions from 0.9.10 to 0.9.11 #84