mirror of
https://github.com/NickeManarin/ScreenToGif.git
synced 2026-04-26 07:35:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #689] Colour reduction algorithm comparison #2232
Labels
No labels
copy cats
duplicated
future feature
pull-request
⬜ Accepted
⬜ Completed
⬜ Help Wanted 💪
⬜ In Progress
⬜ Missing Details
⬜ Pending
⬜ Waiting For Answer ⏳
🆕 feature preview
🔷 Bug 🐛
🔷 Out Of Scope
🔷 Out Of Scope
🔷 Question
🔷Enhancement
🔷Enhancement
🔷Invalid / External
🔷Knowledge Base
🔷Won't Fix
🕑 High
🕑 High
🕑 High
🕕 Medium
🕙 Low
🕛 Critical
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ScreenToGif#2232
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @KybernetikGames on GitHub (Jul 8, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NickeManarin/ScreenToGif/issues/689
I just updated to v2.26.1 and tried out the new colour reduction algorithms and figured I'd give some feedback.
Neural Network says it's good for lots of colours and works reasonably for the main body of the video, but did really badly on the progress bar at the bottom (5 pixels):
Octree gave me a smallest file size with a perfect progress bar and the expected colour banding. This is definitely the best one for my purposes.
Saying Median Cut is "less good" is a bit of an understatement. Larger file size, screwed up colours, banding in the progress bar, and horrendous ghosting all in one:
Greyscale looks good, but has the largest file size.
Most Used Colours is pretty bad too, with poor colouring (as expected) and a different kind of artifacts on the progress bar. But at least it gave the second smallest file size.