mirror of
https://github.com/NickeManarin/ScreenToGif.git
synced 2026-04-25 23:25:52 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #112] Which GIF encoder to be used in which situation #1469
Labels
No labels
copy cats
duplicated
future feature
pull-request
⬜ Accepted
⬜ Completed
⬜ Help Wanted 💪
⬜ In Progress
⬜ Missing Details
⬜ Pending
⬜ Waiting For Answer ⏳
🆕 feature preview
🔷 Bug 🐛
🔷 Out Of Scope
🔷 Out Of Scope
🔷 Question
🔷Enhancement
🔷Enhancement
🔷Invalid / External
🔷Knowledge Base
🔷Won't Fix
🕑 High
🕑 High
🕑 High
🕕 Medium
🕙 Low
🕛 Critical
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ScreenToGif#1469
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @panther2 on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/NickeManarin/ScreenToGif/issues/112
There are three GIF encoders to select from: 2.0 - 1.0 - System
Are there any hints, pros, cons about when to use which encoder?
@NickeManarin commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):
2.0 = Only good if there's not so many colors on your recording.
1.0 = General use.
System = Compatibility reasons.
My idea was to completely replace v.1.0 with v2.0, but I couldn't finish to develop that encoder (with more customizations).
@panther2 commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):
Thanks a lot!
@panther2 commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2017):
@NickeManarin
I am reopening this issue as I noticed a change with the new version 2.8:
Encoder choice is now:
So again my question: Which encoder do you now recommend for which purpose?
Thanks a lot 😃
@Riajyuu commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2017):
@NickeManarin Why not add them to the tool tips. Now I see only 2.0 has tool tips.
@panther2 commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2017):
I was under the impression that - because of the renaming from "2.0" to "ScreenToGif" - the "new" encoder was no longer "experimental", that's why I asked - but there still appears "experimental" in the tool tip.
Also in the Wiki there is still the old description:
Not sure if "ScreenToGif" represents "V2" at what status (still under development?) and "Vorgänger/Predecessor" is V1...
@NickeManarin would you please explain the actual status/use cases?
Thank you again 😃
@NickeManarin commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2017):
@panther2 Sorry, the translation (German, I believe) still uses the old naming scheme. It should be v1.0 and v2.0 as the English version says.
I'll replace when I get home. Thanks.
@panther2 commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2017):
Oh, we already had the labels "v2" and "v1" in prior versions, even in German (as used in my first posting above) ... that's why I thought things have changed...
Thank you for clearing it up, @NickeManarin ...
So the Wiki description is still up to date?
@NickeManarin commented on GitHub (Jun 19, 2017):
@panther2 Yes. :)
Next big update I'll focus on the encoding process.