mirror of
https://github.com/ushahidi/SMSSync.git
synced 2026-04-25 15:55:57 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #58] message_id #51
Labels
No labels
Bug report
Code improvement
Concern
Feature request
Feature request
Good first issue to work on
In progress
Needs info
Question
Ready
Translation
User Experience
User Experience
Website
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/SMSSync#51
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @alissonlinneker on GitHub (Nov 13, 2012).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ushahidi/SMSSync/issues/58
The message_id just returns 0
@eyedol commented on GitHub (Nov 15, 2012):
@alissonlinneker I'll look into this
@saratovout commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2013):
message-id = 0 always, only if user defined auto-delete. If the message remains, the counter increases.
@ghost commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2013):
That is bad. Now, because this supposedly unique message id is anything but unique, I have to perform all kinds of checks on the server side to determine if a message is something we have already seen or not. (If connection to server times out before SMSSync gets the "ok" reply from server, SMSSync will try to send it again later. A few times this has resulted for me in batches of a few hundred multipart messages being sent out several times, totalling a few thousand extra messages. Lucky me I have a 12000 message package so I didn't go over the quota, but without the said server side checks I added that could well happen. Also, duplicates are irritating to recipients.)
@saratovout commented on GitHub (Jan 25, 2013):
@agenttihirvinen imho you have to check it at the Web server, you can do so
$uid = md5($_POST["from"].$_POST["message"].$_POST["sent_timestamp"]);@eyedol commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2013):
This is related to #60 I'm going to close this.