mirror of
https://github.com/ushahidi/SMSSync.git
synced 2026-04-25 07:45:53 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #56] Crashing when receiving high load of messages #49
Labels
No labels
Bug report
Code improvement
Concern
Feature request
Feature request
Good first issue to work on
In progress
Needs info
Question
Ready
Translation
User Experience
User Experience
Website
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/SMSSync#49
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @mandric on GitHub (Oct 30, 2012).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ushahidi/SMSSync/issues/56
Hello, I can replicate a crash on SMSSync in the emulator just by using telnet and
sms sendwith multiple messages (50+) then smsync crashes and I get the Force Quit message from Android (http://cl.ly/image/0F3A3w1p3M2w). I'm using 1.1.9 because i need to support Android 2.x. Here's the trace I get and the point in the code from the trace. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this, thanks!@mandric commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2012):
Hrm I think I have a patch... this seems to fix it for me.
@eyedol commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2012):
@mandric Are you sending the 50+ messages at a goal? And oh 2.x.x should support Android 2.x and above. It only dropped support for 1.6. I'll try and reproduce the issue and patch the code with your fix.
@mandric commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2012):
Pretty sure I had the same issue whether I setup a syncurl or not. I'm not sure what you mean by goal.
I should start using the 2.x branch then, I had trouble compiling it with that target. e.g.
android update project --target "android-10" -p .I'll try again...@eyedol commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2012):
@mandric I meant 50 messages at a time?