[GH-ISSUE #379] SMSSync capitalisation is inconsistent #271

Closed
opened 2026-02-28 01:23:57 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @alxndrsn on GitHub (Apr 6, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ushahidi/SMSSync/issues/379

Just wondering which is correct:

  1. SMSSync, or
  2. SMSsync
Originally created by @alxndrsn on GitHub (Apr 6, 2016). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ushahidi/SMSSync/issues/379 Just wondering which is correct: 1. SMSSync, or 2. SMSsync
kerem 2026-02-28 01:23:57 +03:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    Question
    label
Author
Owner

@mandric commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2016):

From what I gather the "marketing" or published name is SMSsync, the proper camel caps (code) spelling is SMSSync.

<!-- gh-comment-id:206931103 --> @mandric commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2016): From what I gather the "marketing" or published name is SMSsync, the proper camel caps (code) spelling is SMSSync.
Author
Owner

@eyedol commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2016):

Correct with @mandric comment. We changed the name from SMSSync to SMSsync

<!-- gh-comment-id:213364459 --> @eyedol commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2016): Correct with @mandric comment. We changed the name from `SMSSync` to `SMSsync`
Author
Owner

@alxndrsn commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2016):

👍

<!-- gh-comment-id:213366516 --> @alxndrsn commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2016): :+1:
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/SMSSync#271
No description provided.