[GH-ISSUE #204] using ilmerge to combine dependencies #86

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 15:48:41 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:48:41 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @rabbitsmith on GitHub (May 26, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/quasar/Quasar/issues/204

i am interested to know whether we could use ilmerge.exe to combine mono.cecil and other libraries (not client.bin and client.exe) with xrat.exe si that we can get a minimized number of dependencies. could be useful to implement needs of issue #130

Originally created by @rabbitsmith on GitHub (May 26, 2015). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/quasar/Quasar/issues/204 i am interested to know whether we could use ilmerge.exe to combine mono.cecil and other libraries (not client.bin and client.exe) with xrat.exe si that we can get a minimized number of dependencies. could be useful to implement needs of issue #130

kerem closed this issue

2026-02-27 15:48:41 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:48:42 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (May 26, 2015):

This is not useful for xRAT.exe, but more for the client.

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (May 26, 2015): This is not useful for xRAT.exe, but more for the client.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:48:42 +03:00

Author

Owner

@rabbitsmith commented on GitHub (May 26, 2015):

so can we reopen issue #130?

@rabbitsmith commented on GitHub (May 26, 2015): so can we reopen issue #130?

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:48:42 +03:00

Author

Owner

@yankejustin commented on GitHub (May 26, 2015):

This does not minimize the number of dependencies. In essence, we still would be dependent on external libraries that we have little control of. This would have the unfortunate side-effect of making things more difficult.

@yankejustin commented on GitHub (May 26, 2015): This does not minimize the number of dependencies. In essence, we still would be dependent on external libraries that we have little control of. This would have the unfortunate side-effect of making things more difficult.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:48:42 +03:00

Author

Owner

@rabbitsmith commented on GitHub (May 27, 2015):

fortunately we can create separate projects for common classes like protobuf and encryption.

@rabbitsmith commented on GitHub (May 27, 2015): fortunately we can create separate projects for common classes like protobuf and encryption.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:48:42 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (May 27, 2015):

No.

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (May 27, 2015): No.