[GH-ISSUE #531] Any consequences building for x86 ? #293

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 15:49:44 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:49:44 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Sep 22, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/quasar/Quasar/issues/531

Are there any consequences in building & using the client for x86 architecture, rather than using "Any CPU" ?

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Sep 22, 2016). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/quasar/Quasar/issues/531 Are there any consequences in building & using the client for x86 architecture, rather than using "Any CPU" ?

kerem

2026-02-27 15:49:44 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
question
label

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:49:44 +03:00

Author

Owner

@yankejustin commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2016):

I am pretty sure it should be fine! :)

@yankejustin commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2016): I am pretty sure it should be fine! :)

kerem commented

2026-02-27 15:49:44 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2016):

I think you mixed something up. The client is always built for x86 architecture. lol

@MaxXor commented on GitHub (Sep 22, 2016): I think you mixed something up. The client is always built for x86 architecture. lol

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-27 15:53:01 +03:00

[PR #293] [MERGED] Improved UPnP reliability #1077