mirror of
https://github.com/quasar/Quasar.git
synced 2026-04-26 07:45:57 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #387] Listen to more then 1 port/password #182
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
cant-reproduce
discussion
duplicate
easy
enhancement
help wanted
improvement
invalid
need more info
pull-request
question
wont-add
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/Quasar#182
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @webiummedia on GitHub (Sep 9, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/quasar/Quasar/issues/387
When we have multiple servers on different ports we can only listen to one at the time. Being able to add more then one would make it possible to view the complete list over all ports/password combinations.
@yankejustin commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2015):
@MaxXor What is your opinion on this?
@yankejustin commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2015):
Actually, we should already be able to listen on different ports. Have you tried such yet, @webiummedia ? If so, what was the result?
@webiummedia commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2015):
Well right now, theirs only one spot to insert a port and a password ... If the current app can already sustain more then one port/password combination perhaps a redesign of the setting box should be considered to have a box like in the builder where you can add multiple host:port.
@yankejustin commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2015):
Oh. I've always just ran multiple servers instead of using the same instance... Hmm...
@MaxXor commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2015):
We can add this, but we'll need a new window just for managing the listen-servers.
@webiummedia commented on GitHub (Sep 10, 2015):
Never thought of opening quazar more then one time haha In any case, i think having only one instance would be a great feature if we go ahead in keeping the offline servers. Everything in one place.