mirror of
https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman.git
synced 2026-04-27 00:55:57 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #478] Keep the same content file after duplicate request in Map Local #473
Labels
No labels
Discussion
Feature request
In Progress...
Plugins
Waiting response
Windows
Windows
bug
duplicate
enhancement
feature
good first issue
iOS
macOS 10.11
question
wontfix
✅ Done
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/Proxyman#473
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @thang-nm on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/478
Originally assigned to: @NghiaTranUIT on GitHub.
Proxyman version?
1.12.0
macOS Version?
10.15.4
Steps to reproduce
-> New request is created but it uses source request's file.
Expected behavior
Create a new file for new request.
@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):
It's my intention to create a new local file rather than reusing the old one. Because sometime I would try a different set of param, then I can enable/disable the one I need without touching the original Map Local Entry.
If those local files are the same source, it would mess up.
@thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):
Yes, i expect it will create a new local file, but it's not.
@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):
Ah, I see. My mistake 😅
I'm going to fix it this weekend 👍
@thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):
Thank you 😀
@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):
@thang-nm check out this build: https://proxyman.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beta/Proxyman_1.21.0_Duplicate_Local_File.dmg
From now, only
.jsonfile (HTTPMessage) will be duplicated. The directory or other file will keep the same 🙌@thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):
Thank you so much. I will try it ;)
@tbaranes commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2020):
I was going to write this same issue then I see an available beta, thanks a lot for your reactivity :)