[GH-ISSUE #478] Keep the same content file after duplicate request in Map Local #473

Closed
opened 2026-03-03 19:19:06 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @thang-nm on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/478

Originally assigned to: @NghiaTranUIT on GitHub.

Proxyman version?

1.12.0

macOS Version?

10.15.4

Steps to reproduce

  1. Tool > Map Local
  2. Right click on a request
  3. Hit "Duplicate"
    -> New request is created but it uses source request's file.

Expected behavior

Create a new file for new request.

Originally created by @thang-nm on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/478 Originally assigned to: @NghiaTranUIT on GitHub. ### Proxyman version? 1.12.0 ### macOS Version? 10.15.4 ### Steps to reproduce 1. Tool > Map Local 2. Right click on a request 3. Hit "Duplicate" -> New request is created but it uses source request's file. ### Expected behavior Create a new file for new request.
kerem 2026-03-03 19:19:06 +03:00
Author
Owner

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):

It's my intention to create a new local file rather than reusing the old one. Because sometime I would try a different set of param, then I can enable/disable the one I need without touching the original Map Local Entry.

If those local files are the same source, it would mess up.

<!-- gh-comment-id:615123785 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020): It's my intention to create a new local file rather than reusing the old one. Because sometime I would try a different set of param, then I can enable/disable the one I need without touching the original Map Local Entry. If those local files are the same source, it would mess up.
Author
Owner

@thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):

Yes, i expect it will create a new local file, but it's not.

<!-- gh-comment-id:615129863 --> @thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020): Yes, i expect it will create a new local file, but it's not.
Author
Owner

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):

Ah, I see. My mistake 😅

I'm going to fix it this weekend 👍

<!-- gh-comment-id:615130961 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020): Ah, I see. My mistake 😅 I'm going to fix it this weekend 👍
Author
Owner

@thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):

Thank you 😀

<!-- gh-comment-id:615132502 --> @thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020): Thank you 😀
Author
Owner

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):

@thang-nm check out this build: https://proxyman.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beta/Proxyman_1.21.0_Duplicate_Local_File.dmg

From now, only .json file (HTTPMessage) will be duplicated. The directory or other file will keep the same 🙌

<!-- gh-comment-id:615315827 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020): @thang-nm check out this build: https://proxyman.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beta/Proxyman_1.21.0_Duplicate_Local_File.dmg From now, only `.json` file (HTTPMessage) will be duplicated. The directory or other file will keep the same 🙌
Author
Owner

@thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020):

Thank you so much. I will try it ;)

<!-- gh-comment-id:615316534 --> @thang-nm commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2020): Thank you so much. I will try it ;)
Author
Owner

@tbaranes commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2020):

I was going to write this same issue then I see an available beta, thanks a lot for your reactivity :)

<!-- gh-comment-id:615813926 --> @tbaranes commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2020): I was going to write this same issue then I see an available beta, thanks a lot for your reactivity :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Proxyman#473
No description provided.