[GH-ISSUE #469] [Feature] Map Local - Remote depending on request method type #465

Open
opened 2026-03-03 19:19:01 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @yeradis on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/469

Originally assigned to: @NghiaTranUIT on GitHub.

The Map Local / Remote feature is really nice

But it would be better if I had the option of being able to make settings according to the type of request.

What do I mean?

Given the same endpoint but for example a PUT request would be nice to reply something different to the GET request method, in this way we can have multipole rules enabled without the need to first do one stuff, then go and disable that rule, enable the another response because you are going to perform a different call over the same endpoint... also this is not possible in a lot of cases because there are chained calls to server

Originally created by @yeradis on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/469 Originally assigned to: @NghiaTranUIT on GitHub. The Map Local / Remote feature is really nice But it would be better if I had the option of being able to make settings according to the type of request. What do I mean? Given the same endpoint but for example a PUT request would be nice to reply something different to the GET request method, in this way we can have multipole rules enabled without the need to first do one stuff, then go and disable that rule, enable the another response because you are going to perform a different call over the same endpoint... also this is not possible in a lot of cases because there are chained calls to server
Author
Owner

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020):

Hi @yeradis,

To simplify, Do you mean that I should add Method Type Rule to Map Local / Remote? Like what I did on the Breakpoint (https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/453#issuecomment-605636672) ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:607861286 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020): Hi @yeradis, To simplify, Do you mean that I should add Method Type Rule to Map Local / Remote? Like what I did on the Breakpoint (https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/453#issuecomment-605636672) ?
Author
Owner

@yeradis commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020):

To simplify, Do you mean that I should add Method Type Rule to Map Local / Remote? Like what I did on the Breakpoint (https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/453#issuecomment-605636672) ?

Yes exactly like that

<!-- gh-comment-id:607864790 --> @yeradis commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020): > To simplify, Do you mean that I should add Method Type Rule to Map Local / Remote? Like what I did on the Breakpoint (https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/453#issuecomment-605636672) ? Yes exactly like that
Author
Owner

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020):

Cool. It makes sense to add Method because the same domains, but different methods could have a different response.

I will support it in the next release 👍 Thank for raising it 🌮

<!-- gh-comment-id:607865735 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2020): Cool. It makes sense to add Method because the same domains, but different methods could have a different response. I will support it in the next release 👍 Thank for raising it 🌮
Author
Owner

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2020):

@yeradis Check out this BETA build: https://proxyman.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beta/Proxyman_1.20.0_Local_Remote_Map_With_Method_Rule.dmg

Screen Shot 2020-04-04 at 19 44 12 Screen Shot 2020-04-04 at 19 43 50

I'm going to release an official build this weekend Sunday 🙌

<!-- gh-comment-id:609023330 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2020): @yeradis Check out this BETA build: https://proxyman.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beta/Proxyman_1.20.0_Local_Remote_Map_With_Method_Rule.dmg <img width="1648" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-04 at 19 44 12" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5878421/78450972-b321a300-76ac-11ea-9a0f-9feea4b9d2bd.png"> <img width="1301" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-04 at 19 43 50" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5878421/78450978-bddc3800-76ac-11ea-8f74-90bbaa6ff9e0.png"> I'm going to release an official build this weekend Sunday 🙌
Author
Owner

@yeradis commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2020):

Amazing! Going to try

<!-- gh-comment-id:609027984 --> @yeradis commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2020): Amazing! Going to try
Author
Owner

@yeradis commented on GitHub (Apr 5, 2020):

Works great!

<!-- gh-comment-id:609365205 --> @yeradis commented on GitHub (Apr 5, 2020): Works great!
Author
Owner

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 5, 2020):

Glad to hear that 🌮 🎉

<!-- gh-comment-id:609367637 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Apr 5, 2020): Glad to hear that 🌮 🎉
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Proxyman#465
No description provided.