starred/Proxyman
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman.git synced 2026-04-27 17:15:49 +03:00
Code Issues 1.2k Projects Releases 5 Packages Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #1712] Not catching request if host is an IP address (from within Docker container) #1705

New issue
Open
opened 2026-03-03 19:53:39 +03:00 by kerem · 11 comments
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:39 +03:00
Owner
Copy link

Originally created by @sandrodz on GitHub (Jul 6, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/1712

Description

When doing requests directly to an IP address proxyman is not catching requests.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. docker exec into a running container and issue command curl http://google.com request is logged correctly
  2. issue command curl to some IP address curl http://21.72.127.222:8089/api/operation/getPriceTypes request is missing from proxyman
image image

Environment

  • App version: e.g Proxyman 4.8.2
  • macOS version: 13.4.1 (22F82)
  • Docker version: 4.21.0 (113844)
Originally created by @sandrodz on GitHub (Jul 6, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/issues/1712 ## Description When doing requests directly to an IP address proxyman is not catching requests. ## Steps to Reproduce 1. docker exec into a running container and issue command `curl http://google.com` request is logged correctly 2. issue command curl to some IP address `curl http://21.72.127.222:8089/api/operation/getPriceTypes` request is missing from proxyman <img width="1091" alt="image" src="https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/assets/8479569/c0a4e4a8-9f0c-4270-80e4-478ebe6c3b4d"> <img width="1523" alt="image" src="https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/assets/8479569/d993f534-632f-46dc-af9a-8538038d5de0"> ## Environment - App version: e.g Proxyman 4.8.2 - macOS version: 13.4.1 (22F82) - Docker version: 4.21.0 (113844)
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:39 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023):

@sandrodz Can you use --proxy localhost:9090 in your cURL command? I guess cURL doesn't send the request (with IP address) to Proxyman, so Proxyman could not capture.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1624846898 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023): @sandrodz Can you use `--proxy localhost:9090` in your cURL command? I guess `cURL` doesn't send the request (with IP address) to Proxyman, so Proxyman could not capture.
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:39 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023):

Here is example:

curl -v "http://54.204.94.184/get?id=123" --proxy localhost:9090

https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/assets/5878421/9f4c2dc6-f0ed-4c54-a6eb-d8cf6c0f5423

If you don't want to use --proxy localhost:9090 flag, you might use Automatic Script and start your docker, run bash in the new Terminal.

It's injected some code (for example, override HTTP_PROXY and HTTPS_PROXY env), so Proxyman can automatically capture all traffic.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1624850949 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023): Here is example: ``` curl -v "http://54.204.94.184/get?id=123" --proxy localhost:9090 ``` https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/assets/5878421/9f4c2dc6-f0ed-4c54-a6eb-d8cf6c0f5423 ----------- If you don't want to use `--proxy localhost:9090` flag, you might use [Automatic Script](https://docs.proxyman.io/automatic-setup/automatic-setup) and start your docker, run bash in the new Terminal. It's injected some code (for example, override HTTP_PROXY and HTTPS_PROXY env), so Proxyman can automatically capture all traffic.
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:39 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

@NghiaTranUIT I am encountering this from within docker container.
From the local machine it works fine. Like you've demonstrated.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1642069681 --> @sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): @NghiaTranUIT I am encountering this from within docker container. From the local machine it works fine. Like you've demonstrated.
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

@sandrodz Have you tried to start the Docker Container within the Automatic Script Terminal ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1642072984 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): @sandrodz Have you tried to start the Docker Container within the [Automatic Script](https://docs.proxyman.io/automatic-setup/automatic-setup) Terminal ?
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

@NghiaTranUIT yes, and result is same. I am not sure how setting env variables helps containers.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1642084299 --> @sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): @NghiaTranUIT yes, and result is same. I am not sure how setting env variables helps containers.
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

@sandrodz can you follow this Doc to setup the HTTP Proxy in Docker env? https://docs.docker.com/network/proxy/

Should point to http://localhost:9090 or http://127.0.0.1:9090

<!-- gh-comment-id:1642113809 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): @sandrodz can you follow this Doc to setup the HTTP Proxy in Docker env? https://docs.docker.com/network/proxy/ Should point to `http://localhost:9090` or `http://127.0.0.1:9090`
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

@NghiaTranUIT this worked:

image
<!-- gh-comment-id:1642231753 --> @sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): @NghiaTranUIT this worked: <img width="433" alt="image" src="https://github.com/ProxymanApp/Proxyman/assets/8479569/6bc36cc8-cf04-4a8e-b767-3b9ef329c48f">
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):

@NghiaTranUIT this is generally a better way via docker-compose.proxyman.yml override:

version: '2'
services:
  php8.1-fpm-xdebug:
    environment:
      HTTP_PROXY: host.docker.internal:9090
      HTTPS_PROXY: host.docker.internal:9090
      http_proxy: host.docker.internal:9090
      https_proxy: host.docker.internal:9090

docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.php8.1-fpm-xdebug.yml -f docker-compose.proxyman.yml up -d

This is better and requires no docker daemon restart. When switching on/off.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1642279537 --> @sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023): @NghiaTranUIT this is generally a better way via docker-compose.proxyman.yml override: ``` version: '2' services: php8.1-fpm-xdebug: environment: HTTP_PROXY: host.docker.internal:9090 HTTPS_PROXY: host.docker.internal:9090 http_proxy: host.docker.internal:9090 https_proxy: host.docker.internal:9090 ``` `docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.php8.1-fpm-xdebug.yml -f docker-compose.proxyman.yml up -d` This is better and requires no docker daemon restart. When switching on/off.
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023):

Thanks @sandrodz I will update your suggestion to the Docker Documentation

<!-- gh-comment-id:1643487242 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023): Thanks @sandrodz I will update your suggestion to the [Docker Documentation](https://docs.proxyman.io/debug-devices/docker)
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023):

@NghiaTranUIT but still, proxyman doesn't need anything to route non-ip based traffic from containers why ip is different? I think its better to resolve at the source. So we don't have to route traffic deliberatly.

This is a only gripe I've with proxyman with docker.
Otherwise I love this product (even purchasd license to support you guys).

<!-- gh-comment-id:1643544583 --> @sandrodz commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023): @NghiaTranUIT but still, proxyman doesn't need anything to route non-ip based traffic from containers why ip is different? I think its better to resolve at the source. So we don't have to route traffic deliberatly. This is a only gripe I've with proxyman with docker. Otherwise I love this product (even purchasd license to support you guys).
kerem commented 2026-03-03 19:53:40 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023):

Thanks. I will find a better solution to make it works out of the box.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1643568996 --> @NghiaTranUIT commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023): Thanks. I will find a better solution to make it works out of the box.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
6.9.0
6.8.0
6.7.0
6.6.0
6.5.0
6.4.0
6.3.0
6.2.0
6.1.0
6.0.2
6.0.0
6.0.1
5.25.0
5.24.0
5.23.0
5.23.1
5.22.0
5.20.0
5.21.0
5.19.0
5.18.0
5.17.0
5.16.0
5.15.0
5.14.0
5.12.2
5.12.1
5.12.0
5.11.0
5.10.0
5.8.0
5.9.0
5.7.0
5.6.1
5.6.0
5.5.0
5.4.0
5.2.0
5.3.0
5.1.1
5.0.0
4.16.0
4.15.0
4.14.0
4.13.0
4.12.0
4.11.0
4.10.0
4.9.1
4.9.0
4.8.2
4.8.1
4.8.0
4.7.1
4.7.0
4.6.1
4.6.0
4.5.0
4.4.0
4.3.1
4.3.0
4.2.1
4.2.0
4.1.0
4.0.0
3.15.0
3.14.0
3.13.0
3.12.0
3.11.0
3.10.0
3.9.0
3.8.0
3.7.0
3.6.2
3.6.1
3.6.0
3.5.2
3.5.1
3.5.0
3.4.0
3.3.0
3.2.0
3.1.0
3.0.0
2.35.4
2.35.3
2.35.2
2.35.1
2.35.0
2.34.1
2.34.0
2.33.0
2.32.1
2.32.0
2.31.0
2.30.0
2.29.0
2.28.0
2.27.0
2.26.0
2.25.0
2.24.0
2.23.0
2.22.0
2.21.1
2.21.0
2.20.0
2.19.0
2.18.0
2.17.0
2.16.1
2.16.0
2.15.2
2.15.1
2.15.0
2.14.2
2.14.1
2.14.0
2.13.0
2.12.0
2.11.1
2.11.0
2.10.0
2.9.1
2.9.0
2.8.0
2.7.0
2.6.0
2.5.3
2.5.2
2.5.1
2.5.0
2.4.2
2.4.1
2.4.0
2.3.0
2.2.0
2.1.1
2.1.0
2.0.1
2.0.0
1.24.0
1.23.0
1.22.0
1.21.0
1.20.0
1.19.0
1.18.1
1.18.0
1.17.1
1.17.0
1.16.0
1.15.0
1.14.1
1.14.0
1.13.1
1.13.0
1.12.0
1.11.0
1.10.0
1.9.3
1.9.2
1.9.1
1.9.0
1.8.0
1.7.2
1.7.1
1.7.0
1.6.2
1.6.1
1.6.0
1.5.1
1.5.0
1.4.7
1.4.6
1.4.5.1
1.4.5
1.4.4.1
1.4.4
1.4.3
1.4.2
1.4.1.1
1.4.1
1.4
1.3.9
1.3.8
1.3.7
1.3.6
1.3.5
1.3.4.3
1.3.4.2
1.3.4.1
1.3.4
1.3.3
1.3.2
1.3.1
1.3
1.2
1.1.2
1.1.1
1.1
1.0.3
1.0.2
1.0
0.8.1
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5.1
0.5
v0.4.1
Labels
Clear labels   
Discussion

   
Feature request

   
In Progress...

   
Plugins

   
Waiting response

   
Windows

   
Windows

   
bug

   
duplicate

   
enhancement

   
feature

   
good first issue

   
iOS

   
macOS 10.11

   
question

   
wontfix

   
✅ Done
No labels
Discussion
Feature request
In Progress...
Plugins
Waiting response
Windows
Windows
bug
duplicate
enhancement
feature
good first issue
iOS
macOS 10.11
question
wontfix
✅ Done
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Proxyman#1705
No description provided.