starred/ProxmoxVE

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE.git synced 2026-04-25 01:06:06 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #67] Transfer of original repo into this organization #10

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-26 12:44:07 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:44:07 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Neustradamus on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE/issues/67

Please verify that you have read and understood the guidelines.

yes

A clear and concise description of the issue.

@tteck: Why the original repository has not been moved into @community-scripts organization?

https://github.com/tteck/Proxmox

Can you do it?

What settings are you currently utilizing?

Default Settings

Which Linux distribution are you employing?

Alpine

If relevant, including screenshots or a code block can be helpful in clarifying the issue.

No response

Please provide detailed steps to reproduce the issue.

No response

Originally created by @Neustradamus on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE/issues/67 ### Please verify that you have read and understood the guidelines. yes ### A clear and concise description of the issue. @tteck: Why the original repository has not been moved into @community-scripts organization? - https://github.com/tteck/Proxmox Can you do it? ### What settings are you currently utilizing? Default Settings ### Which Linux distribution are you employing? Alpine ### If relevant, including screenshots or a code block can be helpful in clarifying the issue. _No response_ ### Please provide detailed steps to reproduce the issue. _No response_

kerem closed this issue

2026-02-26 12:44:07 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:44:07 +03:00

Author

Owner

@newzealandpaul commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

I am not sure the original reasoning, but please keep in mind tteck may not be able to answer questions. I don't think it matters going forward.

@newzealandpaul commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): I am not sure the original reasoning, but please keep in mind tteck may not be able to answer questions. I don't think it matters going forward.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:44:07 +03:00

Author

Owner

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

tteck wants the original code to remain unprocessed. The original repo has therefore been archived.

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): tteck wants the original code to remain unprocessed. The original repo has therefore been archived.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:44:07 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Neustradamus commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

@MickLesk: It has not been solved, can you reopen?

I have already explained steps to @BramSuurdje :)

The goal is to do not lost the history, fork, star, etc. and there will have redirections.

14.3k stars
194 Watchers
2.3k Forks

@Neustradamus commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): @MickLesk: It has not been solved, can you reopen? I have already explained steps to @BramSuurdje :) The goal is to do not lost the history, fork, star, etc. and there will have redirections. - 14.3k stars - 194 Watchers - 2.3k Forks

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-26 12:44:43 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #946] BookStack MFA Issues After Script Updating to v24.10.3 #203

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-26 12:45:48 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #2533] Firefly III update function broken #531

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/ProxmoxVE#10

No description provided.

Rows
Columns