[GH-ISSUE #275] Server Configurations: IP Address: IPv6 not working #92

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-26 12:40:09 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:40:09 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @YoSiJo on GitHub (Nov 5, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE-Local/issues/275

✅ Have you read and understood the above guidelines?

yes

📝 Provide a clear and concise description of the issue.

Can not add a new Proxmox server, over there IPv6 Address.

🔄 Steps to reproduce the issue.

Use
Add a server over there IPv6 Address (Routable).
Use
See Please enter a valid IP address

❌ Paste the full error output (if available).

Please enter a valid IP address

🖼️ Additional context (optional).

I think the code line is this and so i can see, is this regexx IPv4 only and missing a IPv6 Regex (Example).

Originally created by @YoSiJo on GitHub (Nov 5, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE-Local/issues/275 ### ✅ Have you read and understood the above guidelines? yes ### 📝 Provide a clear and concise description of the issue. Can not add a new Proxmox server, over there IPv6 Address. <img width="848" height="622" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/767897ed-fead-4a3a-8e5e-c1763337c2fa" /> ### 🔄 Steps to reproduce the issue. 1. Use <img width="203" height="40" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/626a595e-d9b8-422f-afaf-ee328712e729" /> 2. Add a server over there IPv6 Address (Routable). 3. Use <img width="107" height="40" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd262005-5529-49cd-b829-2f08689a88a9" /> 4. See `Please enter a valid IP address` ### ❌ Paste the full error output (if available). `Please enter a valid IP address` ### 🖼️ Additional context (optional). I think the code line is [this](https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE-Local/blob/881456e74e5c1a16366f3c41281bd1d678e43976/src/app/_components/ServerForm.tsx#L67) and so i can see, is this regexx IPv4 only and missing a IPv6 Regex ([Example](https://ihateregex.io/expr/ipv6/)).

kerem

2026-02-26 12:40:09 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement
label

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:40:09 +03:00

Author

Owner

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2025):

implementet but i can not test as i have no IPv6 Network. Please Report when it is not working.

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2025): implementet but i can not test as i have no IPv6 Network. Please Report when it is not working.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:40:09 +03:00

Author

Owner

@YoSiJo commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2025):

Thank @michelroegl-brunner very much for implementing this.
It looks good so far, with FQDNs, short names, and IPv6 routable addresses such as ULAs and the like working.
Unfortunately, only link local addresses do not work. A short List of my Test:

OK: 192.168.0.254
OK: pve
OK: pve.example.com
OK: 2a00:ae00:e2:7600:bb24:119f:fe2c:30db
OK: 999.999.999.999 (echo '9.9.9.9 999.999.999.999' >> /etc/hosts)
FAILED: fe80::be24:11ff:fe28:30db%eth0

I only checked the Link Local variant as an additional option, but it would certainly be useful for some people. My case is perfectly covered by the FQDNs, so thanks again.

@YoSiJo commented on GitHub (Nov 7, 2025): Thank @michelroegl-brunner very much for implementing this. It looks good so far, with FQDNs, short names, and IPv6 routable addresses such as ULAs and the like working. Unfortunately, only link local addresses do not work. A short List of my Test: - OK: `192.168.0.254` - OK: `pve` - OK: `pve.example.com` - OK: `2a00:ae00:e2:7600:bb24:119f:fe2c:30db` - OK: `999.999.999.999` (`echo '9.9.9.9 999.999.999.999' >> /etc/hosts`) - FAILED: `fe80::be24:11ff:fe28:30db%eth0` I only checked the Link Local variant as an additional option, but it would certainly be useful for some people. My case is perfectly covered by the FQDNs, so thanks again.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:40:09 +03:00

Author

Owner

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2025):

thank you for your feedback and testing, appreciated it!
I look into the link-local stuff again.

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2025): thank you for your feedback and testing, appreciated it! I look into the link-local stuff again.