[GH-ISSUE #17] [Feature] Add pritunl-zero support #15

Open
opened 2026-02-27 23:03:23 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @yarons on GitHub (Feb 18, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/simonmicro/Pritunl-Fake-API/issues/17

I already created an ARM64 version of it here:
https://github.com/yarons/pritunl-zero-docker

Maybe even including this in the docker for a precracked environment.

Originally created by @yarons on GitHub (Feb 18, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/simonmicro/Pritunl-Fake-API/issues/17 I already created an ARM64 version of it here: https://github.com/yarons/pritunl-zero-docker Maybe even including this in the docker for a precracked environment.
Author
Owner

@simonmicro commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022):

Hey, this looks interesting. You may create a PR, so I can take a look into what exactly you try to achieve and what modifications you propose.

Thanks in advance.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1058163050 --> @simonmicro commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022): Hey, this looks interesting. You may create a PR, so I can take a look into what exactly you try to achieve and what modifications you propose. Thanks in advance.
Author
Owner

@yarons commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022):

I have no idea how it works in terms of breaking the license, it's a bit different code base, any thought on how can this be achieved?

I was thinking orignally that if there was any way of just putting a server without modifying the code it would be pretty simple but it's not working that way.

My docker is the original product without any modifications.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1058250003 --> @yarons commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022): I have no idea how it works in terms of breaking the license, it's a bit different code base, any thought on how can this be achieved? I was thinking orignally that if there was any way of just putting a server without modifying the code it would be pretty simple but it's not working that way. My docker is the original product without any modifications.
Author
Owner

@simonmicro commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2022):

how it works in terms of breaking the license

I'm very sorry, but what are you talking about? This project here is just emulating an Pritunl API endpoint, which just accepts "any" license. Written in PHP - very simple.

I was thinking orignally that if there was any way of just putting a server without modifying the code it would be pretty simple but it's not working that way.

Are you talking about your bastion implementation or this project?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1059300181 --> @simonmicro commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2022): > how it works in terms of breaking the license I'm very sorry, but what are you talking about? This project here is just emulating an Pritunl API endpoint, which just accepts "any" license. Written in PHP - very simple. > I was thinking orignally that if there was any way of just putting a server without modifying the code it would be pretty simple but it's not working that way. Are you talking about your bastion implementation or this project?
Author
Owner

@yarons commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2022):

Ohhhhh I misexplained myself, sorry about that.
Pritunl has another product called Pritunl Zero.

I was thinking about adapting the same solution you did for Pritunl but for Pritunl Zero, I'm sorry if my link was misleading.
Thanks and sorry again.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1059769409 --> @yarons commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2022): Ohhhhh I misexplained myself, sorry about that. Pritunl has another product called Pritunl Zero. I was thinking about adapting the same solution you did for Pritunl but for Pritunl Zero, I'm sorry if my link was misleading. Thanks and sorry again.
Author
Owner

@Zer0Down commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2022):

Hi Simon,
As yarons was explaining Pritunl Zero is another version of Pritunl. Can be seen more on here

https://docs.pritunl.com/docs/pritunl-zero-service#install
https://zero.pritunl.com/

It looks like licensing on api calls looks similar, would it be possible to add support for this particular software as well?
Thank you kindly.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1271678218 --> @Zer0Down commented on GitHub (Oct 7, 2022): Hi Simon, As yarons was explaining Pritunl Zero is another version of Pritunl. Can be seen more on here https://docs.pritunl.com/docs/pritunl-zero-service#install https://zero.pritunl.com/ It looks like licensing on api calls looks similar, would it be possible to add support for this particular software as well? Thank you kindly.
Author
Owner

@simonmicro commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2022):

Oh, this is indeed an idea - I'll reopen this until I have someone has time for that...

<!-- gh-comment-id:1274405349 --> @simonmicro commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2022): Oh, this is indeed an idea - I'll reopen this until ~~I have~~ someone has time for that...
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/Pritunl-Fake-API#15
No description provided.