starred/LinuxGSM

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM.git synced 2026-04-25 14:15:59 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #4043] [BUG] UT99 Details command won't show Web Admin port properly #2597

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @Wolterhon on GitHub (Nov 19, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM/issues/4043

User Story

As a server admin, I want to see my current Web Admin port for the UT99 server so that I could connect to the web admin panel with the specified port.

Basic info

Distro: [Debian 11 5.10.0-18-amd64]
Game: [Unreal Tournament 99]
Command: [Details]
LinuxGSM version: [v22.2.1]

Further Information

Despite the fact that the web panel works with the port specified in the config file (/home/ut99server/serverfiles/System/ut99server.ini in the ListenPort parameter of the [UWeb.WebServer] section) the port is not present in the Details output, it's shown as 'Web Admin 0 tcp 3' (screenshot 1).

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behaviour:

Make sure you have a port specified in the config (path can be seen above in the Further Information section).
Start the server and then issue the 'details' comand.
Despite the fact you can connect with the specified port to the web panel, the port is not present in the output of 'details'.

Expected behaviour

Port should be visible in the output instead of always being 0.

Originally created by @Wolterhon on GitHub (Nov 19, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM/issues/4043 ## User Story As a server admin, I want to see my current Web Admin port for the UT99 server so that I could connect to the web admin panel with the specified port. ## Basic info - **Distro:** [Debian 11 5.10.0-18-amd64] - **Game:** [Unreal Tournament 99] - **Command:** [Details] - **LinuxGSM version:** [v22.2.1] ## Further Information Despite the fact that the web panel works with the port specified in the config file (/home/ut99server/serverfiles/System/ut99server.ini in the ListenPort parameter of the [UWeb.WebServer] section) the port is not present in the Details output, it's shown as 'Web Admin 0 tcp 3' (screenshot 1). ## To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behaviour: 1. Make sure you have a port specified in the config (path can be seen above in the Further Information section). 2. Start the server and then issue the 'details' comand. 3. Despite the fact you can connect with the specified port to the web panel, the port is not present in the output of 'details'. ## Expected behaviour Port should be visible in the output instead of always being 0. ![WindowsTerminal_2O8uUFBrsQ](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23475741/202858256-cd8ef58e-f159-4649-acb2-ecb470ab4ca2.png)

kerem

2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
type: bug

distro: Debian

game: Unreal Tournament 99
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@m-kozlowski commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2023):

fn_info_game_ut99() refers to webadminport variable, but sets httpport github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM@930c7c8cac/lgsm/functions/info_game.sh (L1993)

@m-kozlowski commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2023): fn_info_game_ut99() refers to webadminport variable, but sets httpport https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM/blob/930c7c8cac21de9fbf4e108e2324aa79c35b08c7/lgsm/functions/info_game.sh#L1993

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2023):

Good catch we will need to look at this.

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2023): Good catch we will need to look at this.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (May 26, 2023):

Major refactor of details command incoming.

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (May 26, 2023): Major refactor of details command incoming.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (May 29, 2023):

refactor completed. Issue should now be resolved

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (May 29, 2023): refactor completed. Issue should now be resolved

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:04:01 +03:00

Author

Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024):

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024): This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-27 03:55:34 +03:00

[PR #2608] [MERGED] Feature/2597 https to http #3722