starred/LinuxGSM

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM.git synced 2026-04-25 06:05:57 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #3512] [BUG] Avorion avserver.cfg admins not used in config #2371

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-27 03:02:31 +03:00 by kerem · 8 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:31 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @kdulep on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM/issues/3512

Originally assigned to: @Claiyc on GitHub.

User Story

Command-line Parameters

./server.sh --galaxy-name avserver --ip 0.0.0.0 --datapath /home/avserver/serverfiles/galaxy

adminsteamid="XXXXXXX"
password= also never used

I want dedicated server use steam admin "XXXXXXX"

Basic info

Distro: [CentOS8]
Game: [Avorion]
Command: [Details]
LinuxGSM version: [v21.2.4]

Further Information

Seems avserver.cfg dont get used

in server log:
administrators:
Warning: Your server does not have an administrator assigned.

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behaviour:

Change avserver.cfg adminsteamid="1232321321321321"
Start server
See details dt
No admin option to exe

Expected behaviour

admin passed to exe
"password" used in server

Originally created by @kdulep on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM/issues/3512 Originally assigned to: @Claiyc on GitHub. ## User Story Command-line Parameters ==================================================================== ./server.sh --galaxy-name avserver --ip 0.0.0.0 --datapath /home/avserver/serverfiles/galaxy adminsteamid="XXXXXXX" password= also never used I want dedicated server use steam admin "XXXXXXX" ## Basic info * **Distro:** [CentOS8] * **Game:** [Avorion] * **Command:** [Details] * **LinuxGSM version:** [v21.2.4] ## Further Information Seems avserver.cfg dont get used in server log: administrators: Warning: Your server does not have an administrator assigned. ## To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behaviour: 1. Change avserver.cfg adminsteamid="1232321321321321" 2. Start server 3. See details dt 4. No admin option to exe ## Expected behaviour admin passed to exe "password" used in server

kerem

2026-02-27 03:02:31 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
type: bug

game: Avorion
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021):

Avorion admins should be defined in serverfiles/admin.xml. See https://www.citadelservers.com/client/knowledgebase/183/Adding-Admins-to-your-Avorion-Server.html (Method 2).

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021): Avorion admins should be defined in serverfiles/admin.xml. See https://www.citadelservers.com/client/knowledgebase/183/Adding-Admins-to-your-Avorion-Server.html (Method 2).

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@kdulep commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021):

why thre option adminsteamid? in code it should add admins to command line

@kdulep commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021): why thre option adminsteamid? in code it should add admins to command line

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021):

why thre option adminsteamid? in code it should add admins to command line

You‘re right, that should work. Not sure why it doesn‘t.

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Jul 11, 2021): > why thre option adminsteamid? in code it should add admins to command line You‘re right, that should work. Not sure why it doesn‘t.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (Sep 24, 2021):

So I guess the question is. Should the adminsteamid in _default.cfg be removed since the xml option is probably the better method?

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (Sep 24, 2021): So I guess the question is. Should the adminsteamid in _default.cfg be removed since the xml option is probably the better method?

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021):

I guess yes. Imho it doesn‘t make much sense to be able to configure it in two different ways. That only adds an unnecessary layer of complexity.

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021): I guess yes. Imho it doesn‘t make much sense to be able to configure it in two different ways. That only adds an unnecessary layer of complexity.

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021):

Makes sense. It won't be in for this release. So if you want to fix this one when you get back feel free 🙂

@dgibbs64 commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021): Makes sense. It won't be in for this release. So if you want to fix this one when you get back feel free 🙂

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021):

I put it on my todo list :)

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (Sep 25, 2021): I put it on my todo list :)

kerem commented

2026-02-27 03:02:32 +03:00

Author

Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2022):

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2022): This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.