[GH-ISSUE #2715] Review Minecraft Java Support #1964

Open
opened 2026-02-27 03:00:05 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @dgibbs64 on GitHub (Mar 10, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM/issues/2715

User Story

As a developer, I want to review Minecraft support and better understand the server so that improved support for mods and other features can be better implemented

Basic info

  • Game: Minecraft

Further Information

A clear description of what the feature is and any ideas on how to achieve this.

Further Reading

Provide any useful documentation or resources that might help.

Originally created by @dgibbs64 on GitHub (Mar 10, 2020). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/GameServerManagers/LinuxGSM/issues/2715 ## User Story As a developer, I want to review Minecraft support and better understand the server so that improved support for mods and other features can be better implemented ## Basic info * **Game:** Minecraft ## Further Information A clear description of what the feature is and any ideas on how to achieve this. ## Further Reading Provide any useful documentation or resources that might help.
Author
Owner

@disconsented commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2020):

In terms of low hanging fruit it'd be good to support:

  • RAM
  • File name (for non vanilla server support)
  • Java flags

At the moment I use the following for when I run MC via LGSM:

javaram="8192"
mcjar="forge.jar"
flags="-XX:+UseG1GC -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=100 -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:TargetSurvivorRatio=90 -XX:G1NewSizePercent=50 -XX:G1MaxNewSizePercent=80 -XX:G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent=35 -XX:+AlwaysPreTouch -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled"
executable="java -Xmx${javaram}M -Xms${javaram}M ${flags} -jar ${serverfiles}/${mcjar}"

If you want to take things a step further you'd want to consider supporting support for alternate server software for example:

<!-- gh-comment-id:619524448 --> @disconsented commented on GitHub (Apr 26, 2020): In terms of low hanging fruit it'd be good to support: - RAM - File name (for non vanilla server support) - Java flags At the moment I use the following for when I run MC via LGSM: ```bash javaram="8192" mcjar="forge.jar" flags="-XX:+UseG1GC -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=100 -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:TargetSurvivorRatio=90 -XX:G1NewSizePercent=50 -XX:G1MaxNewSizePercent=80 -XX:G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent=35 -XX:+AlwaysPreTouch -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled" executable="java -Xmx${javaram}M -Xms${javaram}M ${flags} -jar ${serverfiles}/${mcjar}" ``` If you want to take things a step further you'd want to consider supporting support for alternate server software for example: - [Spigot](https://www.spigotmc.org/) - [Paper](https://papermc.io/) - [Forge](https://files.minecraftforge.net/) - [SpongeVanilla](https://www.spongepowered.org/downloads/spongevanilla/stable/1.12.2) - [Fabric](https://fabricmc.net/)
Author
Owner

@cydactyl commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2020):

+1 for at the very least paper support, it supports both spigot & bukkit plugins, and is much more optimized than vanilla, bukkit, and spigot, by far. They seem to have a clean update procedure, and json api to fetch the latest version e.x. https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper/1.16.1/latest/download

You can see the raw json @ https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper

1.16.1 version would be listed under https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper/1.16.1/

so on and so forth.

Should I create a seperate feature request for PaperMC support?

<!-- gh-comment-id:661661742 --> @cydactyl commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2020): +1 for at the very least paper support, it supports both spigot & bukkit plugins, and is much more optimized than vanilla, bukkit, and spigot, by far. They seem to have a clean update procedure, and json api to fetch the latest version e.x. https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper/1.16.1/latest/download You can see the raw json @ https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper 1.16.1 version would be listed under https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper/1.16.1/ so on and so forth. Should I create a seperate feature request for PaperMC support?
Author
Owner

@MrGraversen commented on GitHub (May 6, 2021):

+1 for papermc.io support. I'm struggling a bit to balance performance vs. server cost when running with 5 or more players. It'd be nice to include some support for alternative server JARs.

<!-- gh-comment-id:833622926 --> @MrGraversen commented on GitHub (May 6, 2021): +1 for papermc.io support. I'm struggling a bit to balance performance vs. server cost when running with 5 or more players. It'd be nice to include some support for alternative server JARs.
Author
Owner

@Claiyc commented on GitHub (May 6, 2021):

+1 for papermc.io support. I'm struggling a bit to balance performance vs. server cost when running with 5 or more players. It'd be nice to include some support for alternative server JARs.

Papermc is supported since v21.2.0 (see #3292 )

<!-- gh-comment-id:833655109 --> @Claiyc commented on GitHub (May 6, 2021): > > > +1 for papermc.io support. I'm struggling a bit to balance performance vs. server cost when running with 5 or more players. It'd be nice to include some support for alternative server JARs. Papermc is supported since v21.2.0 (see #3292 )
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
Atomic
Epic
cannot reproduce
command: backup
command: console
command: debug
command: details
command: fast-dl
command: install
command: mods
command: monitor
command: post-details
command: restart
command: send
command: start
command: stop
command: update
command: update-lgsm
command: validate
command: wipe
distro: AlmaLinux
distro: Arch Linux
distro: CentOS
distro: Debian
distro: Fedora
distro: RedHat
distro: Rocky Linux
distro: Ubuntu
distro: openSUSE
engine: goldsrc
engine: source
game: 7 Days to Die
game: ARMA 3
game: Ark: Survival Evolved
game: Assetto Corsa
game: Avorion
game: BATTALION: Legacy
game: Barotrauma
game: Battalion 1944
game: Battlefield 1942
game: Black Mesa: Deathmatch
game: Blade Symphony
game: Call of Duty 2
game: Call of Duty 4
game: Call of Duty: United Offensive
game: Counter-Strike 1.6
game: Counter-Strike 2
game: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
game: Counter-Strike: Source
game: Day of Infamy
game: Dayz
game: Death Match Classic
game: Don't Starve Together
game: ET: Legacy
game: Eco
game: Factorio
game: Factorio
game: Garry's Mod
game: Half-Life
game: Hurtword
game: Insurgecy
game: Insurgecy
game: Insurgency: Sandstorm
game: Just Cause 3
game: Killing Floor
game: Killing Floor 2
game: Left 4 Dead 2
game: Minecraft
game: Minecraft Bedrock
game: Mordhau
game: Multi Theft Auto
game: Mumble
game: Natural Selection 2
game: No More Room in Hell
game: Pavlov VR
game: Post Scriptum
game: Project Zomboid
game: Quake 3
game: QuakeWorld
game: Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45
game: Return to Castle Wolfenstein
game: Rising World
game: Rust
game: San Andreas Multiplayer
game: Satisfactory
game: Soldat
game: Soldier of Fortune 2
game: Squad
game: Squad 44
game: Starbound
game: Stationeers
game: Sven Co-op
game: Team Fortress 2
game: Teamspeak 3
game: Teeworlds
game: Terraria
game: The Front
game: Unreal Tournament 2004
game: Unreal Tournament 3
game: Unreal Tournament 99
game: Unturned
game: Valheim
game: Wurm Unlimited
game: Zombie Master Reborn
game: label missing
good first issue
help wanted
info: alerts
info: dependency
info: docker
info: docs
info: email
info: query
info: steamcmd
info: systemd
info: tmux
info: website
info: website
needs more info
outcome: duplicate
outcome: issue resolved
outcome: issue resolved
outcome: issue unresolved
outcome: pr accepted
outcome: pr rejected
outcome: unconfirmed
outcome: wontfix
outcome: wrong forum
potential-duplicate
priority
pull-request
type: bug
type: feature
type: feature
type: feature request
type: game server request
type: refactor
waiting response
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/LinuxGSM#1964
No description provided.