[GH-ISSUE #72] Control-C Is there a way? #53

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-04 02:11:11 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-04 02:11:11 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @uglygus on GitHub (Jun 7, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tytydraco/LADB/issues/72

Is there some way to exit a running shell command? I can't find a way to send signals or Control-C.

Originally created by @uglygus on GitHub (Jun 7, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tytydraco/LADB/issues/72 Is there some way to exit a running shell command? I can't find a way to send signals or Control-C.

kerem

2026-03-04 02:11:11 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement
label

kerem commented

2026-03-04 02:11:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@teou1 commented on GitHub (Oct 14, 2022):

I have tried to, there is no way. I either do not make loops in scripts or close ladb and reopen, or use termux.

I actually think that is a good suggestion for the future: just give us the good old terminal prompt, no need from this input row. It make problems like popping the keyboard by loops all the time and decreasing the visible space (try this)
while true; do dumpsys battery; sleep 5; done
And as mentioned, if it was just a terminal one could install hacker keyboard and easily breaking the loop with ctrl c.

@teou1 commented on GitHub (Oct 14, 2022): I have tried to, there is no way. I either do not make loops in scripts or close ladb and reopen, or use termux. I actually think that is a good suggestion for the future: just give us the good old terminal prompt, no need from this input row. It make problems like popping the keyboard by loops all the time and decreasing the visible space (try this) `while true; do dumpsys battery; sleep 5; done` And as mentioned, if it was just a terminal one could install hacker keyboard and easily breaking the loop with ctrl c.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 02:11:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@tytydraco commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2022):

This is a good idea, I believe I tried this before but it wasn't successful. Let me try this again.

@tytydraco commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2022): This is a good idea, I believe I tried this before but it wasn't successful. Let me try this again.

kerem commented

2026-03-04 02:11:12 +03:00

Author

Owner

@tytydraco commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2022):

Turns out this is not possible because the ADB process is the only thing we have a handle on, not the subprocesses in the interactive shell

@tytydraco commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2022): Turns out this is not possible because the ADB process is the only thing we have a handle on, not the subprocesses in the interactive shell

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-04 02:11:43 +03:00

[PR #53] [MERGED] Update Chinese translate #120