mirror of
https://github.com/ErlichLiu/DeepClaude.git
synced 2026-04-25 05:05:57 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #88] [Question]: cursor agent mode使用deepclaude有意义吗? #59
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
pull-request
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/DeepClaude#59
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ujfjhz on GitHub (Mar 11, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ErlichLiu/DeepClaude/issues/88
提问前确认
问题类别
最佳实践
您的问题
使用cursor时,在plan阶段cot毫无疑问非常有意义,但到了coding阶段还有必要太多的think吗?
如果cursor接入deepclaude,那意味着agent模式下一直都是cot+generation吧,担心具体coding过程中太多think容易跑偏,编码阶段想法太多也有问题吧
背景信息
NA
代码示例(如适用)
其他信息
No response
@GowayLee commented on GitHub (Mar 11, 2025):
个人觉得不是很有意义, 虽然可能会提高单次edit的质量, 但是连带来的耗时与token成本的增加可能反而降低了使用体验. 而且Compose模式本就是工作流, 在edit之前会有步骤进行任务规划, editor进行思考的意义不大.