mirror of
https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak.git
synced 2026-04-25 12:35:59 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #93] did cloak support tcp fast open? #82
Labels
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/Cloak#82
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @qwerttvv on GitHub (Jan 21, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak/issues/93
cloak with ss, plug mode
should i open tcp fast open from ss?
@qwerttvv commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2020):
btw, what is this ERROR: server recv: Connection reset by peer?
@qwerttvv commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2020):
error msg="trying to close a closed session"
its a ss msg or cloak?
in plug mode, how to know which msg belongs to?
@malikshi commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2020):
I recommend to use bbr plus instead using tfo(tcp fast open) if you're using cloak plugin. I remembered cloak+tfo would have big cpu usage?
@malikshi commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2020):
You need to learn using github first xD
@qwerttvv commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2020):
i think there is no conflict between tfo and bbr
i have tried ss(tfo open)+cloak 3hours more with the server, cpu usage is normal
there is only one thing to worry, is about safety
many years ago, tfo traffic was very small, interfering with tfo traffic will not have a big impact
but now, more and more normal server is begin to use tfo, so, many traffic is tfo traffic, maybe tfo is safe now
between cloak and ss, tfo is absolutely secure, because traffic is only inside the server
btw, you can try bbr2
@nerekihs commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2020):
@malikshi
@qwerttvv is right: there is no conflict between TFo and BBR.
TFO reduce the time to make a connection between two endpoints which had a connection before by using a cookie.
BBR improves the tcp transmission effeiciency by adjusting the size of tcp window accordingly. This process is after the TFO process.
@Klaaktu commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2021):
Should fast open be turned off in client or server Shadowsocks if Cloak doesn't support it?
@cbeuw commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2021):
@klaaktu It shouldn't really affect anything because the communication between Shadowsocks and Cloak is entirely on loopback (assuming you have them on the same machine). It won't affect detection chance and the bandwidth should be close to memory speed whether or not you have TFO turned on