[GH-ISSUE #169] This is really good project but... #136

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-26 12:34:05 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:34:05 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @lessload on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak/issues/169

This is really good project but something dev should consider.

name "cloak" is hard to find topic relate in search engine like google or etc. Make this project hard to get information and unpopular. recommend to change the name to something like "ck-cloak"
re-design logo. (just recommend not importance much)
wiki too low information for newbie. just open for community to edit it. something like https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/wiki do.
or link to guid example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GikgtMBoaKo , https://www.oilandfish.com/posts/openvpn-cloak.html
or script like https://github.com/HirbodBehnam/Shadowsocks-Cloak-Installer for deployment.

This project really good.
In my opinion concept of this project better than "stunnel" and "V2Ray". but need a lot of feature develop and security audit.

Originally created by @lessload on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak/issues/169 This is really good project but something dev should consider. - name "cloak" is hard to find topic relate in search engine like google or etc. Make this project hard to get information and unpopular. recommend to change the name to something like "ck-cloak" - re-design logo. (just recommend not importance much) - wiki too low information for newbie. just open for community to edit it. something like https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/wiki do. - or link to guid example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GikgtMBoaKo , https://www.oilandfish.com/posts/openvpn-cloak.html - or script like https://github.com/HirbodBehnam/Shadowsocks-Cloak-Installer for deployment. - This project really good. In my opinion concept of this project better than "stunnel" and "V2Ray". but need a lot of feature develop and security audit.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:34:06 +03:00

Author

Owner

@notsure2 commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2021):

Yes it has a big advantage of not needing any TLS certificate on the server side.

@notsure2 commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2021): Yes it has a big advantage of not needing any TLS certificate on the server side.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 12:34:06 +03:00

Author

Owner

@diyism commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2022):

Yes it has a big advantage of not needing any TLS certificate on the server side.

Yes, it's better than v2ray, trojan-go, and naiveproxy, all of them need to deploy a domain name and tls cert,
and it's better than any "sni trick" / "domain fronting" tools: PowerTunnel, SNI-Mask, revolter-firefox etc.
I even think that we should integrate the Cloak client into the chrome/firefox/bromite browser and integrate the Cloak server into the caddy/haproxy/nico web server.
Why isn't there a standalone Cloak VPN?

@diyism commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2022): > Yes it has a big advantage of not needing any TLS certificate on the server side. Yes, it's better than v2ray, trojan-go, and naiveproxy, all of them need to deploy a domain name and tls cert, and it's better than any "sni trick" / "domain fronting" tools: PowerTunnel, SNI-Mask, revolter-firefox etc. I even think that we should integrate the Cloak client into the chrome/firefox/bromite browser and integrate the Cloak server into the caddy/haproxy/nico web server. Why isn't there a standalone Cloak VPN?

No labels

pull-request

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/Cloak#136

No description provided.

Rows
Columns