mirror of
https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak-android.git
synced 2026-04-25 19:45:50 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #41] please increase versionCode with each release #32
Labels
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/Cloak-android#32
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @IzzySoft on GitHub (Jul 14, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/cbeuw/Cloak-android/issues/41
Looks like you forgot to increase
versionCodewith the latest release – like the previous one, it still uses22there.versionCodeis what Android uses internally to tell versions apart – so whoever has the previous release installed won't get an update notification for the current one as Android will think it is already there.Thanks in advance!
@linsui commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024):
It only has changes for F-Droid and reproducible. :) But I guess you can use fastlane metadata in this repo now.
@IzzySoft commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024):
What does that have to do with
versionCode, @linsui? A new release does not necessarily need Fastlane – but it must have theversionCodeincreased – which cannot be "healed" via Fastlane 😜That said: look at
full_description.txthere and compare it with the description at IoD, then you know why I have it disabled. Hint: fulldesc lacks the details 😉@linsui commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024):
You can ignore the new tags since it doesn't have any new features but only some build script tweak for reproducible build. :)
So would you like to PR your version? :)
@IzzySoft commented on GitHub (Jul 17, 2024):
Does F-Droid's updater also ignore tags which correspond to the definition in the YAML now? 😉 But let's drop this topic, linsui – that was not advice to you but rather to Andy.
If it's welcome, of course. So @cbeuw do you want to have it? See here for what it entails.