[GH-ISSUE #1234] [Feature Request] : Email only domains in Analyser #689

Closed
opened 2026-03-02 12:44:21 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @procradminator on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/1234

As some domains are not used for email could their security score be calculated with different parameters? Like a null value for MX record give green etc? Maybe it could look for a TXT record with a value of "not_used_for_email" to report accordingly?

Originally created by @procradminator on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/1234 As some domains are not used for email could their security score be calculated with different parameters? Like a null value for MX record give green etc? Maybe it could look for a TXT record with a value of "not_used_for_email" to report accordingly?
kerem 2026-03-02 12:44:21 +03:00
Author
Owner

@procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022):

I wonder if I can remember my issue number for this?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1326601103 --> @procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022): I wonder if I can remember my issue number for this?
Author
Owner

@procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022):

Actually, scrap the dedicated TXT record, this would do.

If TXT record exists of “v=spf1 -all”

<!-- gh-comment-id:1326603926 --> @procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022): Actually, scrap the dedicated TXT record, this would do. If TXT record exists of “v=spf1 -all”
Author
Owner

@JohnDuprey commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022):

Hey @procradminator! We already have Null MX support built in, including extra checks to help prevent your domain from being abused for spoofing.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1326605456 --> @JohnDuprey commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022): Hey @procradminator! We already have Null MX support built in, including extra checks to help prevent your domain from being abused for spoofing.
Author
Owner

@procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022):

Well, the little question marks offering to take me to "Null DKIM documentation" don't seem to work. Is that just me or a seperate issue that needs raising?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1326672773 --> @procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022): Well, the little question marks offering to take me to "Null DKIM documentation" don't seem to work. Is that just me or a seperate issue that needs raising?
Author
Owner

@JohnDuprey commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022):

There's just one info link on the MX record: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP-API/blob/master/MailProviders/Null.json

<!-- gh-comment-id:1326749250 --> @JohnDuprey commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022): There's just one info link on the MX record: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP-API/blob/master/MailProviders/Null.json
Author
Owner

@procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022):

I'm guessing once I've correctly added all the relevant records this request will no longer be relevant so it can be removed. TIA.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1326801722 --> @procradminator commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2022): I'm guessing once I've correctly added all the relevant records this request will no longer be relevant so it can be removed. TIA.
Author
Owner

@KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (Nov 25, 2022):

Removed, thanks for reporting anyway :)

<!-- gh-comment-id:1327582983 --> @KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (Nov 25, 2022): Removed, thanks for reporting anyway :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/CIPP#689
No description provided.