[GH-ISSUE #928] FEATURE REQUEST: Litigation Hold #485

Closed
opened 2026-03-02 12:42:37 +03:00 by kerem · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @nc-azure on GitHub (May 19, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/928

Originally assigned to: @AdamWillford on GitHub.

Hi Kelvin,

I love what you have done with CIPP, awesome product.

Would it be possible to add a feature to enable Litigation on mailboxes?

Examples:

This would be the command to enable litigation hold on all mailboxes on a tenant:

Get-Mailbox -ResultSize Unlimited | Set-Mailbox -LitigationHoldEnabled $true

This would be a command to report on which mailboxes have Litigation Hold enabled:

get-mailbox | where-object {$_.litigationholdenabled -eq $true} | fl name

Originally created by @nc-azure on GitHub (May 19, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/928 Originally assigned to: @AdamWillford on GitHub. Hi Kelvin, I love what you have done with CIPP, awesome product. Would it be possible to add a feature to enable Litigation on mailboxes? Examples: This would be the command to enable litigation hold on all mailboxes on a tenant: Get-Mailbox -ResultSize Unlimited | Set-Mailbox -LitigationHoldEnabled $true This would be a command to report on which mailboxes have Litigation Hold enabled: get-mailbox | where-object {$_.litigationholdenabled -eq $true} | fl name
kerem 2026-03-02 12:42:37 +03:00
Author
Owner

@AdamWillford commented on GitHub (May 19, 2022):

I would like to work on this please!

<!-- gh-comment-id:1131464600 --> @AdamWillford commented on GitHub (May 19, 2022): I would like to work on this please!
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 19, 2022):

Great! I assigned you (@AdamWillford) to the issue. Have fun working on it!

<!-- gh-comment-id:1131464893 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 19, 2022): Great! I assigned you (@AdamWillford) to the issue. Have fun working on it!
Author
Owner

@nc-azure commented on GitHub (May 19, 2022):

Awesome, thank you Adam :)

<!-- gh-comment-id:1131504652 --> @nc-azure commented on GitHub (May 19, 2022): Awesome, thank you Adam :)
Author
Owner

@KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (May 20, 2022):

Not going to implement this; Microsoft no longer recommends using this, but use DLP policies instead: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/security-and-compliance/in-place-and-litigation-holds

<!-- gh-comment-id:1132886804 --> @KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (May 20, 2022): Not going to implement this; Microsoft no longer recommends using this, but use DLP policies instead: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/security-and-compliance/in-place-and-litigation-holds
Author
Owner

@nc-azure commented on GitHub (May 23, 2022):

Hi Kelvin,

Reading that article and then clicking on the second article from that page, it doesn't seem to be referencing Litigation Hold being removed, but more the On-Hold feature being removed.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/legacy-ediscovery-retirement?view=o365-worldwide

It is still your call at the end of the day, but I thought I would try get some more clarity on this :)

Thanking you in advance

<!-- gh-comment-id:1134308752 --> @nc-azure commented on GitHub (May 23, 2022): Hi Kelvin, Reading that article and then clicking on the second article from that page, it doesn't seem to be referencing Litigation Hold being removed, but more the On-Hold feature being removed. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/legacy-ediscovery-retirement?view=o365-worldwide It is still your call at the end of the day, but I thought I would try get some more clarity on this :) Thanking you in advance
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/CIPP#485
No description provided.