[GH-ISSUE #4676] [Bug]: Default Spam Filter Policy not comparing correctly #2170

Closed
opened 2026-03-02 13:50:10 +03:00 by kerem · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @PeterVive on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/4676

Required confirmations before submitting

  • I can reproduce this issue on the latest released versions of both CIPP and CIPP-API.
  • I have searched existing issues (both open and closed) to avoid duplicates.
  • I am not requesting general support; this is an actual bug report.

Issue Description

Applying the standard "Default Spam Filter Policy" correctly sets the values in the tenant.
However the tenant report shows that the standard is out of compliance, and when viewed is displayed in a malformed way.

Image

Environment Type

Sponsored (paying) user

Front End Version

8.4.2

Back End Version

8.4.2

Relevant Logs / Stack Trace

The logbook unfortunately doesn't show anything as wrong, it just re-applies the standard every time since the standard doesn't seem "in compliance".
Originally created by @PeterVive on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/4676 ### Required confirmations before submitting - [x] **I can reproduce this issue on the latest released versions** of both CIPP and CIPP-API. - [x] **I have searched existing issues** (both open and closed) to avoid duplicates. - [x] I am **not** requesting general support; this is an actual bug report. ### Issue Description Applying the standard "Default Spam Filter Policy" correctly sets the values in the tenant. However the tenant report shows that the standard is out of compliance, and when viewed is displayed in a malformed way. <img width="2396" height="1028" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7774d25e-7ca9-4084-9cf4-e31ca430f0a4" /> ### Environment Type Sponsored (paying) user ### Front End Version 8.4.2 ### Back End Version 8.4.2 ### Relevant Logs / Stack Trace ```plaintext The logbook unfortunately doesn't show anything as wrong, it just re-applies the standard every time since the standard doesn't seem "in compliance". ```
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025):

Thank you for reporting a potential bug. If you would like to work on this bug, please comment:

I would like to work on this please!

Thank you for helping us maintain the project!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3324872402 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025): Thank you for reporting a potential bug. If you would like to work on this bug, please comment: > I would like to work on this please! Thank you for helping us maintain the project!
Author
Owner

@KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025):

!support

<!-- gh-comment-id:3324891170 --> @KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025): !support
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025):

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out! This report has been classified as a support request rather than a bug or feature request. To keep our development process focused, support requests are limited to paying users. This policy allows us to prioritize resources for those actively supporting CIPP, helping us maintain high-quality development and support.

Sponsors can contact our helpdesk directly via email for assistance with any issues or questions. For non-sponsor support, please refer to our documentation and community discussions—many questions have been answered there.

Did you get this notification in error? Reply with a screenshot of your sponsorship payment, and we’ll gladly reopen the request.

Thank you for your understanding,
The CIPP Team

<!-- gh-comment-id:3324891592 --> @github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2025): Hello, Thank you for reaching out! This report has been classified as a **support request** rather than a bug or feature request. To keep our development process focused, support requests are limited to paying users. This policy allows us to prioritize resources for those actively supporting CIPP, helping us maintain high-quality development and support. Sponsors can contact our helpdesk directly via email for assistance with any issues or questions. For non-sponsor support, please refer to our documentation and community discussions—many questions have been answered there. **Did you get this notification in error?** Reply with a screenshot of your sponsorship payment, and we’ll gladly reopen the request. _Thank you for your understanding,_ **The CIPP Team**
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/CIPP#2170
No description provided.