mirror of
https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP.git
synced 2026-04-25 08:16:01 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #4536] [Feature Request]: when client is not in CIPP we want the ability to create a custom alert where we type in the domain, so it alerts on us a password breach. #2090
Labels
No labels
API
Feature
NotABug
NotABug
Planned
Sponsor Priority
Sponsor Priority
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
needs more info
no-activity
no-priority
not-assigned
pull-request
react-conversion
react-conversion
roadmap
security
stale
unconfirmed-by-user
unconfirmed-by-user
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/CIPP#2090
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @alexpostiglionecoreitech on GitHub (Aug 18, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/4536
Please confirm:
Problem Statement
client is not in CIPP so we want the ability to create a custom alert where we type in the domain, so it alerts on us a breach. Running data breach manually works
Benefits for MSPs
helps for security
Value or Importance
security
PowerShell Commands (Optional)
No response
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2025):
Hello,
Thank you for your interest in improving CIPP!
To keep our development process focused and manageable, feature requests are limited to paying users. This policy helps us prioritize improvements that directly benefit those actively supporting CIPP and ensures we can sustain our development and support.
When a sponsor makes a feature request, their support covers training, development, documentation, and security checks. Allowing non-sponsor requests could lead to a backlog that slows down updates and stretches resources thin, ultimately affecting the quality and sustainability of CIPP.
While we’ve closed this request, we appreciate your input. You’re always welcome to participate in ongoing discussions or contribute to open issues. If you are a developer, feel free to open a PR that includes your feature request or comment "I’d like to work on this!" to assign the issue to yourself.
Did you get this notification in error? Reply with a screenshot of your sponsorship payment and we’ll reopen the issue.
Thank you for understanding,
The CIPP Team
@JohnDuprey commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2025):
Verified sponsor
@KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (Aug 22, 2025):
We've discussed this with the dev team - This is out of scope, the work we'd have to implement would be a really big lift and big changes to how CIPP works. If you want them in CIPP, add them to a tenant.