starred/CIPP

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP.git synced 2026-04-25 08:16:01 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #4084] [Feature Request]: Make CA Policy in Vacation Mode a Required Field #1855

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-02 13:47:39 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-02 13:47:39 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @theknoxtech on GitHub (May 13, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/4084

Originally assigned to: @kris6673 on GitHub.

Please confirm:

I have searched existing feature requests (open and closed) and found no duplicates.
**me or my organization is currently an active sponsor of the product at the $99,- level.

Problem Statement

We would like to request that the CA policy selector be required when setting vacation mode. We have had a few instances in which this field is somehow missed by employees when setting vacation mode and it still allows the submission.

Benefits for MSPs

This would be beneficial for MSPs in that they wouldn't have to go back and correct vacation mode settings when a user is out of country because it was submitted without the policy. This would make the use of the feature more and the benefits of it a lot more reliable.

Value or Importance

This isn't exactly critical but the main point of vacation mode is to exclude a user when traveling. I don't think that it is beneficial to have a reliance on a user's attention to detail be the only thing between the exclusion working or not.

PowerShell Commands (Optional)

No response

Originally created by @theknoxtech on GitHub (May 13, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/4084 Originally assigned to: @kris6673 on GitHub. ### Please confirm: - [x] **I have searched existing feature requests** (open and closed) and found no duplicates. - [x] **me or my organization is currently an active sponsor of the product at the $99,- level. ### Problem Statement We would like to request that the CA policy selector be required when setting vacation mode. We have had a few instances in which this field is somehow missed by employees when setting vacation mode and it still allows the submission. ### Benefits for MSPs This would be beneficial for MSPs in that they wouldn't have to go back and correct vacation mode settings when a user is out of country because it was submitted without the policy. This would make the use of the feature more and the benefits of it a lot more reliable. ### Value or Importance This isn't exactly critical but the main point of vacation mode is to exclude a user when traveling. I don't think that it is beneficial to have a reliance on a user's attention to detail be the only thing between the exclusion working or not. ### PowerShell Commands (Optional) _No response_

kerem

2026-03-02 13:47:39 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

no-priority

not-assigned
labels

kerem commented

2026-03-02 13:47:40 +03:00

Author

Owner

@kris6673 commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025):

I would like to work on this please!

@kris6673 commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025): I would like to work on this please!

kerem commented

2026-03-02 13:47:40 +03:00

Author

Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025):

Great! I assigned you (@kris6673) to the issue. Have fun working on it!

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025): Great! I assigned you (@kris6673) to the issue. Have fun working on it!

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-02 13:58:24 +03:00

[PR #1855] [CLOSED] Revert 3 main #3452

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/CIPP#1855

No description provided.

Rows
Columns