mirror of
https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP.git
synced 2026-04-25 08:16:01 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #2943] [Feature Request]: Anti-Spam Connection Filter Safe List #1463
Labels
No labels
API
Feature
NotABug
NotABug
Planned
Sponsor Priority
Sponsor Priority
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
needs more info
no-activity
no-priority
not-assigned
pull-request
react-conversion
react-conversion
roadmap
security
stale
unconfirmed-by-user
unconfirmed-by-user
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/CIPP#1463
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @PurpleGriffin on GitHub (Oct 16, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/KelvinTegelaar/CIPP/issues/2943
Originally assigned to: @kris6673 on GitHub.
Description of the new feature - must be an in-depth explanation of the feature you want, reasoning why, and the added benefits for MSPs as a whole.
I'm looking to have the anti-spam connection filter policy option 'safe list' included in the Defender standards so that it can be configured as part of the standards rather than needing to configure it manually.
Specifically, I'm looking to be able to enable Microsoft's built-in 'safe list' rather than setting my own safe/block list of IPs.
PowerShell commands you would normally use to achieve above request
Set-HostedConnectionFilterPolicy "Default" -EnableSafeList $true
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2024):
This issue is stale because it has been open 10 days with no activity. We will close this issue soon. If you want this feature implemented you can contribute it. See: https://docs.cipp.app/dev-documentation/contributing-to-the-code . Please notify the team if you are working on this yourself.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2024):
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 14 days with no activity.
@kris6673 commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2024):
I would like to work on this please!
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 9, 2024):
Great! I assigned you (@kris6673) to the issue. Have fun working on it!
@PurpleGriffin commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2024):
@kris6673, thanks very much.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024):
This issue is stale because it has been open 10 days with no activity. We will close this issue soon. If you want this feature implemented you can contribute it. See: https://docs.cipp.app/dev-documentation/contributing-to-the-code . Please notify the team if you are working on this yourself.
@kris6673 commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024):
Bump to keep open
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2024):
This issue is stale because it has been open 10 days with no activity. We will close this issue soon. If you want this feature implemented you can contribute it. See: https://docs.cipp.app/dev-documentation/contributing-to-the-code . Please notify the team if you are working on this yourself.
@kris6673 commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2024):
Bump 2 - The resurrection
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2024):
This issue is stale because it has been open 10 days with no activity. We will close this issue soon. If you want this feature implemented you can contribute it. See: https://docs.cipp.app/dev-documentation/contributing-to-the-code . Please notify the team if you are working on this yourself.
@kris6673 commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2024):
Bump 3 - Return of the bump
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 24, 2024):
This issue is stale because it has been open 10 days with no activity. We will close this issue soon. If you want this feature implemented you can contribute it. See: https://docs.cipp.app/dev-documentation/contributing-to-the-code . Please notify the team if you are working on this yourself.
@KelvinTegelaar commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2025):
Connection Filter templating added by @BNWEIN
@PurpleGriffin commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2025):
Could this please be reopened, the request was specifically about making this configurable via Standards. The connection filter templates are appreciated and useful for an initial setup however without a way to continually apply the template or include the template in a standard this doesn't work at scale or beyond an initial setup.